Laserfiche WebLink
428 <br /> September g,1981 <br /> 11 <br /> a pointed outs development w second largest lling units, <br /> haat and hay 2 more doeiRun's 75 acres. He <br /> ld ordded <br /> was also ated on 200 acres,compared to d a ceded to dediccept ate <br /> any <br /> share <br /> in a public1parks <br /> 0 kse with the devite elope a of Madison Park. <br />• <br /> lnsaid <br /> llaccept <br /> July <br /> comeomisebut <br /> wudorthe appicantbrnging forhanother <br /> altrrative for co consideration. <br /> 1 He said he approved of e„ red to extension <br /> resented except No.10 of <br /> the I of Findings <br /> aschhee felt it d been determined this would be <br /> funded by he developer. <br /> ng subsectionK. page 1 n B5 a <br /> s: "There shall be no emergency exits with crash without <br /> aepublic hes uldi and allow nnCiluateroval"type house g t the way his section <br /> wa erfer do he felt someattached as duplexes, <br /> 1 on certainin this regard. <br /> p vale He suggested <br /> soul Conclusion na could beam <br /> with Council sensitive areas <br /> couldG possiblek1andacceptableended <br /> GipsonCouncilman said <br /> from <br /> felt the <br /> density <br /> handled ed <br /> separate <br /> psvp r <br /> Ftb surgesaaccomplish this. He then 4 Cattle <br /> should be take pc that <br /> couldCouncil made. <br /> dope the Findings and <br /> a <br /> nd <br /> then amendments could be made <br />•, by <br /> Councilman <br /> the tPmof <br /> Evdretsonid the <br /> elinarp.e an <br /> d <br /> approval efaeow run. <br /> Baker asked Kr. <br /> loses1rd amendment <br /> to Conclusion.12. ethenprpedthat Gennan42 read follows <br /> : <br /> li Housing <br /> Type. Because t surrounding <br /> V <br /> "12.aea ofhe proposed are developed a single-family <br /> detached residential duplex de <br /> I <br /> concludes <br /> that rfive parcel plat,to be residential <br /> andmaintain <br /> existing character <br /> stablishedneighborhoodsshould b <br /> developed utilizing single-family y detached residential units,exceptas <br /> provided below. <br /> approved <br /> density, v equivalenttling units <br /> • per acre(dependingu sector below) <br /> can <br /> onle <br /> justified on dbject property ena can only be made compatible wrtF <br /> established d <br /> for ys <br /> I . real�ws aduyards paeThis accomplished <br /> requiring single-family detached residential units. <br /> of trees,drainage, <br />• <br /> PogdtalhY, where ro Y cal constraints exist o srm b d y t 1 ne" <br /> • ial mayy b reddusing small lots <br /> and..glop li e" <br /> thr ghconcepta W)llowing the design criteria below. Furthermore,in such circumstances attached dwel vng <br /> f <br />