Laserfiche WebLink
497 <br /> October 28,1981 <br /> Bich Royston, 3 Colby,wno had requested ermissblk to hang t <br /> r re problems with liability if .were hung <br /> ne <br /> e.ntown reported much t and frustration, <br /> sesoet buildnal ing at ram ctherEvere Nall,it <br /> ewsiteiolt hung o the <br /> might he rrk iving c o remarked she felt the <br /> City was <br /> not Said he had no <br /> muccomplah earlierdovmtoiron out t <br /> to area n roblemsere so that th nints with the way matters whandled and woaild uldvbewhung <br /> in thyear during-4-H week. c u <br /> MaYkr NO re ti. sa1V havE [the ordinance governing situations such <br /> as ma en7nlaene r r eaeena puncil 70nenrrea. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO..8110-437 <br /> FINAL READING: <br /> AN O /NAN amending Ordinance 5.28.040), <br /> N.293-74,Chapter-7, <br /> (codified a .I 040),reducing the <br /> auctioneers Section <br /> negti vdzeda license Year,ee from Fifty Dollars per rico <br /> Errol • <br /> s Olsen,of 1030 T revs Drive,Saidhehaad requested t <br /> hat <br /> the current m ealisticnance covering auctioneer's fee was planning to locate be hanged t <br /> in Everett but would probably <br /> c 10 n alocation uction <br /> P business. <br /> $2S.00fee rToo ha He 'hId County ulicense£e only <br /> ett'e <br /> that hold auctionsinsaid he averett talked with several auctioneers <br /> and they were in Pavor 0E the Ch _ <br /> e0 100 Esker ns vn submit[Do b 00th.0e 0 CiClerk r0'mmending <br /> that a£ee be changed tot520.n00 par day Or 51perty year. ec <br /> moved by Councilman Alacroft,seconded by Councilman Overstreet,that <br /> this i declared to the final r Council Hill N -437 <br /> as menses o be 0 redo Dollarsperand ChtyoClerk 0is <br /> directed call the roll for t final dispositionofhe ordinance,asnnended <br /> Roll C yes. Pope,Gipson,Overstreet,Michelson,Alacroft, <br /> BNays: Nona ••alser <br /> Ordinance .810-81 Adopted. <br /> BUS FAUN ISPOSITION-(CB 8110-447) <br /> Craig Fullerton,c Public N Oepa toren reported the Real <br /> Estate Disposition Committee had reviewed rthis tp <br /> fssibleejailnsi e. This ad o err swould <br /> been 1 ofeasible <br /> the may thapman <br /> since 19774 asheleaseA e of the <br /> requestton j not renewed <br /> the Committee <br /> eou <br /> ® ds thatsincethoreoj jail <br /> apparent need of the buildingor <br /> landre De for City p this is and because the market i <br /> s not <br /> favorable a purposes <br /> gtat time,that e City re-negotiate with the rChapman Co.fox u perioc one year. a gotvate a <br /> ) <br /> t <br />