My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/10/28 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/10/28 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:32:50 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:38:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/28/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
498 <br /> October 28,1981 <br /> councalman pldcroft one-year period would begin, Mr. <br /> Fullerton replied at the conclusion of .he negotiations.Councilman po, <br /> suggestedof building <br /> i rebsilding <br /> other equipment, <br /> Kozlovska,of Caty Staff,replied <br /> the buses wouldnot <br /> t�eon regular basis <br /> atatame <br /> which w not require the ntieepre" <br /> Moved by Councilman in the recommendationoff Michelson, <br /> Estate <br /> ho <br /> Mayor to negotlate and execute a lease Company <br /> for a one-year period,negotiations not to exceed two months. <br /> Rall was called with all Councilmen voting yes, <br /> Motion Carried <br /> ANNEXATzON MEETING (CB 8110-448( <br /> Craig reported that on hadaccepted <br /> • P with initiators of a petition <br /> ingxeiredd . iuiBoeteminehrfe <br /> toannex under R .. 3cdrthe ow <br /> 1, accept the proposed <br /> allow the <br /> m1Process to c youi,2. Whether the simultaneous ado ton of the <br /> 1Comprehensive v111 an ty will ire the si P <br /> of existing City ndebtedportion <br /> Indebtedness by he area to be annexed.uire the assumption of all or a <br /> 4�1President B• exation aker p for eeen submitted this moenrng signed petition <br /> 3 CC per y owners <br /> bhn• the Ful <br /> lerton sedb be for the cepted the annexation,the next initiatorslto submit <br /> petition <br /> sign <br /> ed evaluation of <br /> perty owners in the area. If <br /> t rs was not submitess 75%of the teed,ithe lan proceed further. <br /> Re then pointed <br /> cy <br /> of the Annexation Policies which reads <br /> as follows. .The itation of.gaps.between <br /> segments of the yty s rough which s Conversely, <br /> the City should not consider annexations <br /> This proposed annexation area would be elimencourage inating gap. gaps.. <br /> tv% Mr.Fullerton said recommendatIon is to accept this annexation <br /> and <br /> the area to <br /> requireume bonded <br /> St. P sstoftthE 1111. <br /> be annexed adoption d to ass <br /> anning Department,sold the zonang was d bycthencomprehensiveme d <br /> uncilman Pope asked aboutithe zoning and Dennis <br /> ,of <br /> the <br /> Plan as medium density sidgle-family resadential. <br /> n�IC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.