Laserfiche WebLink
August 4,1282 <br /> l <br /> The hearing <br /> aThe Board nima m was roee"t represiente, <br /> once <br />• and recommendations of the hthisng examiner that the mill operation <br /> was a non-conforming Use inarea. .0_P the decision,swim <br /> continued to operate the mill. <br /> i In 1 cod..e City Attorney's office received authorization from tReCIaown the mill. <br /> !und that the operation of the sawmill was in violation <br /> ecision of the <br /> naboth d City of Everett xot2ing justment and is <br /> 's were declared dto heb wmille and the di x-1 zone. <br /> he <br /> Swi <br /> dTheayjudge <br /> 9allov effective dnit to see ate <br /> there <br /> alternative to bring the mill to M1as a variance <br /> or a rezone. In Jaof nuary attorney motion <br /> to have twet effective order ti <br /> stayed. under- <br /> standing that <br /> opur pursue his eznePPii <br /> application <br /> the City take the ma before d havethe stay <br /> revoked. <br /> • <br /> The Planning Commission held <br /> ublicsive Plan hearings for that area is Signa request <br /> and ennd that aamtly. The the 1. oniney gei - -so found that the use is -the <br /> land <br /> diuregnest to change thn se <br /> is from -Faand therefore mily to industrial. They re req tv g oncnrrence <br /> ive <br /> Plan <br /> the Council. <br /> He said the staff had tried i other alternative and felt <br /> the only thing that could bed n e to changerequirementsoperation <br /> 1 of R-1 zone to allottonly under <br /> ertain condiions,en <br /> such <br /> 11 as this. There would have to be many 1 wed toPioperate d not fee regulations ole <br /> 1 with thv <br /> during P <br /> nd Smg1C <br /> type • <br /> wever,the of an ordinancCounce. <br /> the C l <br /> Council c o - the <br /> judge ia lman /lesus�,u ,said i the Council <br /> adopted s tothepp <br /> an such as this, <br /> cant. e F eIt ld p bably <br /> be ymthetic <br /> Perate with <br /> thesresident typ P nditionsed if he Council could a sola whim to the it would g <br /> back stry tlyes ofto an R-1 use and Mr.Iles replied yes. <br /> o Councilman <br /> n questioned w e plan was changed after the mill was Penalized <br /> because e las there should a regulations on the operation if v <br /> were continued. <br /> ehelpezm dluses vn xl zone p l ons Iii <br /> • coconditions.cha <br /> the m od <br /> George worked w erating his own mill.v vne <br /> had just received <br /> e of this hearing <br /> last rSatur y and his attorney today <br /> was on vacation. n the maul <br /> • de Councilman mmiee seconded by C change rvn Comprehensive,. the <br /> to allow operation of sawmill at 51st and elm. <br />