Laserfiche WebLink
313 <br /> August 4,1982 <br /> heabou m in n aapickup and then <br /> split them processed 1them by wthea <br /> through a saw. <br /> councilman Overstreet <br /> thia,then asked probablyfwouldab tthe ht s mof moving to olution to his <br /> some <br /> other.location,that and Mr. <br /> lied that he was under the impression it <br /> mould problecost approximatelyp <br /> 875,000 for moving the electrical power alone. <br /> property adjoining the mill,a to <br /> y <br /> sell Phis h e he had n been vable tnaual . <br /> whiniors date <br /> a said also t <br /> mrs.Posh argeta T <br /> told them there wasdcw a and sopd dustJames aobjectf 5118 ,t when he built his house <br /> he$in�red about mill a touit there would be no more ld by t itlso s <br /> noise Conditextending into the evening hours and onathe weekends.Couommented n e <br /> Hendee 6 e ked millwhim if t id operate after <br /> 5:00 and and in the evenings <br /> so the time limit replied <br /> itset had no bearingas on Sunday <br /> on Mr.Swim. <br /> ]m Mloky o£ 5ktnowtnethe$miem wve no op non uo <br /> ed <br /> problems with <br /> it. <br /> Councilman Stephanson aske01 i there was.a-time period Placea'on Me <br /> operation a ons would it be enforceable knd Kr, <br /> Iles said it would. <br /> ouaollman Michelson felt the mill should b a from its present <br /> [he landfill perhacs. This area wa d industrial and <br /> sed by t ity. a nI,tst $electrical workings <br /> e bminea$ab a much smaller moat th n thees�s,poo nogg tea by <br /> Mr.6wimm. of 5039 C eat lane <br /> esoneaein taL the e <br /> r slt' <br /> [e the enfvre a ifthis property were rnwud il. <br /> President a asked if anyone further wished to speak and no one <br /> plied. <br /> 011 w motion <br /> the <br /> commendation of <br /> the Planning Commission <br /> n request Councilmen <br /> voting <br /> and <br /> cilmen.Alaroftand Pope Voting ,and CouncimnSiP n, ho. <br /> was excused. <br /> Motion Carried <br />