Laserfiche WebLink
348 <br /> September 8,1982 <br /> 0 B LVED that theEvereti Ciayd co tie dation <br /> addop[aWthe�eErin99 sOfi�ingeP mncluwions, e mm s <br /> granta�e8horell a Permit to E.ot a er Company for log dumpnfill at <br /> 4000 Railway Avenue. <br /> Roll was called with e11 Councilmen voting yes. <br />'.� Motion Carried <br /> orkahl n <br /> sousrceregandeng LIDcf]lahswoul7 ba deletedpfromd wagenda Lolly.17771n g <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-(CB 828-353) <br /> 1.I. at the <br /> Ervine,s ofthethe <br /> Planning ca t,artment,said Casino <br /> Road Ent aR Road,150' <br /> 3,Multiple <br /> of Lhefua tial, Enterprises, rezoning <br /> R-3, lately iacres osGeneralCommercial, <br /> ergan <br /> area reei Way,across from a the north side <br /> uet aMretailCasino ,150'west <br /> of r. <br /> HeO2sai green pant' cc the <br /> to existing Meyer <br /> Shopping pi Cen <br /> said the commercial <br /> sh intent i86 parka center <br /> the main rugal shops. % site n proposal is186 parking <br /> wastes,3 before <br /> the and a off on J Casino 1982 A public hearing <br /> s held before t Hearing Examiner on July 3,R1 82 who approved. <br /> rezone with 24 conditions. <br /> He said adjoining property owners,Richard Duce and Jan Whalen,were <br /> concerned bout drainage and 5 of these conditions dealt with drainage. <br /> 1 Theo® <br /> reuired setbacks for general commercial ropertn adjoining H-3 e. <br /> 12'.e Therefore,the applicant requested a variance and he was granted <br /> wade,6'-high landscaping screening o t sideof L property. <br /> This was in accordance with t Everett Plan,which had <br /> designated this property as x.111 zone. <br /> requested final reading o the ordinance and concurrence'4. <br /> the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. <br /> Richard Duce,of 19120 Bing Road,Lynnwood,said he was the owner of <br /> the property to the west of the proHearing <br /> osed rezone and he had not <br /> oiv the <br /> notified o the hoaxing before the a ringsE <br /> Planning Department regarding another sm xand nems told about the re <br /> time. He tried f contactsthe Hearing E ner,but was <br />!'. one tto,and finally through the Hearing Examiner's ne secretary oP <br /> unable that the hearing would t be reopened.x fDu requested the <br /> as <br /> toldCouncil to refer this mat[ back to Hearing r for an <br /> 3' public-hearing sot t his testimonycould ybe heard. <br /> Walt 8 A Attorney,rney,said the records do no show <br /> Mr.Duce as tnheawnerof this property,and he had been unable to <br /> contact him. <br /> Councilman <br /> Aldcxoft askif M s <br /> Duc woud be satisfied d If the Council <br /> asked the ed Hearing Examiner to review his testimony,and he repliedhe <br /> wanted n public hearing so that a 1 parties concerned uld hesr <br /> thero <br /> t <br /> tee incould <br /> l <br /> y. <br /> He felt the drainage problem was tremendous in this area nd presented <br /> h <br /> several letters to the Council which he Said were not in the packean <br /> asked them to review them and be made a part of the records. The first <br /> i6. <br />