My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983/10/20 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1983/10/20 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:59:50 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:56:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/20/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
404 <br /> vh' October 20,1982 <br />§ 1 <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO.8210-<69 <br /> ' FIRST READING: <br /> ORDINANCE authorizinhe g the condemnation f al <br /> -,,,J. property ts 0 serve the southwest 5ction of 0eaiofathe City <br /> .ry ewer im- <br /> of Everett,to <br /> President <br /> Pope saiof interest.Councilman <br /> Overstreet would be leaving the meeting <br /> Ybecause ofe onE ict est, <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-(CB 826-261) <br /> •l- Doughty,of the Planning Department,said this was the second <br /> i' <br /> p�4publico hearing requiredby state law vee comprehensiveplan for an <br /> i'", area.annexingh o eastf 19th AveS.E. 100th Street S.E. <br /> �' • said heity Councilhelda public hearing 6o aPlanningC <br /> recommendation a he a back t the commission for Commission <br /> consideration. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on <br /> September 21st and reaffirmed their previous recommendation. The <br /> Planning C 3.63 acres of Commercial d 29.60 <br /> acres MediumDensityResidential,limited to 0 dwelling units per <br /> grossacre for this proposed annexation.`{ The Planning Deartment has a recommendation of5.96 acres of Commercial <br /> •, 7 tt acres acz a of Medium Densty Residential,5-10 <br /> dwelling units per <br /> •f acre andr <br /> 13.46 acres of Multiple Family Residential limited to 15 <br /> dwelling unite per gross acre. <br /> said that property n <br /> J im Allendoerfer,representing the applicant, or <br /> of the church adjacent t 19th Ave.was designated Residential by <br /> Berth <br /> the staff's recommendation and they felt this should b Commercial.ore a <br /> He said they a agreeing to the 15 dwelling units Pergrossa <br /> ended by the staff`although then would prrina002 higher density. <br /> b0 <br /> Then also will agree i <br /> �y `i be t this time, oh o a contract eaone o o cause v <br /> said this proposal should be approved by the Council ho t is <br /> Dundee on t sides by development,it is not going to have traffic <br /> E impacts on the neighborhood,the high density proposal is abutting a <br /> t" )'' commercial node,public transportation service is immediately adjacent <br /> a multi and it is e <br /> h rnmprehnve property,3 zoning at 15 dwelling multipliers and <br /> acre. reasonable <br /> Councflmam Stephenson <br /> ta henson asked about 100th St.being an and out of the <br /> �.a. City and Mr.Allendoerfer said the <br /> County is proposing that that <br /> street beannexed into the City,so100th St.should be a part of the <br /> City of e verett. h <br /> Revd Shacken,of 1012 Hewitt,also representing the applicant,said tlw <br /> impact o roads mill be insignificant and the impact schools very <br /> m' a said the drainage problems intheurea were <br /> 0 o new y no <br /> drainagepolicybut these havebeenchanged s Y development will <br /> F. cause o drainage problem at all. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.