Laserfiche WebLink
. .- <br /> 405 , <br /> I <br /> October 20,1302 . <br /> Councilman Gipson asked about tlm clmrch property and Mr.Shockey I <br /> replied that the church did not care whether the property was I <br /> deaignated as commercial or residential. <br /> He said also that the appdic.t.is willing te sign for a roPd . <br /> improvement district to the extent their property will be bene- <br /> fitted. They have no desire to contact to 23rd or 24.Avenue I <br /> and any road except to 100th St.or 19.AV8.S.E. i <br /> I <br /> councilman Alderoft objected to a residential zone adjacent to <br /> I 19th Ave.as he felt this was not proper designation. <br /> councilman Lamas said he wanted a guarantee that the development <br /> would be an attractive development to the neighborhood and Mr. <br /> Shockey said the site plan,etc.,and.all of the regulations <br /> would stipulate this. He also said they were agreeable to a. . <br /> rezone k-3 which contract,no developmant without a site plan <br /> and at whatever density the Council decides. <br /> E. Tack Alkire,representing the Everett School District,said that <br /> L'5 no SEPA checklist was issued and they were objecting to this <br /> her because the 100th St.problem has not been addressed. He saad <br /> the.was presently a problem because of the many school bus <br /> trips on this street and the children in the area and this would <br /> 3 only add to it. Councilman Gipson asked why he felt this was <br /> going to be an additional problem and how could it be salved , <br /> because he admitted himself the school district was causing a <br /> problem now. Mr.Alkire replied he felt 100th St.had not been <br /> dal, analyzed for the future under this proposed development. • <br /> Councilman Aldosoft then asked if the school board had actually <br /> voted on this proposal and Mr.Alkire said the board had taken no <br /> stand on this development. <br /> Lb <br /> 7;,',vocro'ln,:wn;-.r,pLf.T.r:nraty,„:t11'21°J;f,,11° .:ti.6sE:" I <br /> left as commercial. ' I <br /> r• • I <br /> Janice Whitman,of 112.St.,representing the Silver Lake Cooncil, <br /> said they are oppOsed to the developmant. They a.afraid lgth I <br /> Avenue S.E.woudd end up like Evergreen Way,strip-soned. She said <br /> 4 they might approve a medical clinic if the zone was low density. I <br /> Councilman Stephenson asked if the City was violating any daw by <br /> at having this hearing on the Co.Pl.use,ma Bruce Jones,City <br /> e Attorney,said no,that the law says there shall be two hearings , <br /> and it may be started prior to the final annexation. Also,prior . <br /> to.e zoning being established by the Planning Commission,additional <br /> SEPA review will be required and possidalY an S... <br /> m <br /> ITI:&IleL thSlE pEEPESEY'IT:Ithe'nOrUN,;'=Isit!''e-rami'Y awe"in'' <br /> dm fd Sampson,property owner in the area,approved the land use Plan. <br /> I <br /> George Duecy,owner <br /> ll of property adjacent to the annexation,objected <br /> aI <br /> to the comp Plan. <br /> Dr.Ware,the applicant,said they are satisfied with the plan as It, <br /> presented,but if any change were to be made he felt the change should <br /> .to designate.e.11.to.1. <br /> , <br /> I <br /> ___ <br />