Laserfiche WebLink
445 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 1 <br /> December 8,1982 <br /> FUND GROSS Nr_ij_. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE <br /> VET . <br /> 198 ant PAYROLL <br /> a3,557.36 1,P997.29 1018]28 <br /> 404 Sewer 2],612.8] 13,060.51 14,552.36 5,814.42 <br /> 410 Water 44,002.08 20,897.25 23,104.87 9,112.26 <br /> 425 Transit 54,787.1125,301.92 <br /> 1 <br /> 29,485.19 ]8].32 <br /> 501 equipment Rental 23,402.]3 9,6]6.52 .21 4,909.93 • <br /> CITY TOTALS ]16,119.4] 297,012.96 419,106.51 106,959.99 <br /> poll as called on the Consent Ager.e Items with all Councilmen voting <br /> Motion Carried <br /> GOLF COURSE RATES INCREASE <br /> President Pope said this item had been deleted from theagenda because • <br /> regular process did no take lace This item should have beenrought <br /> backtothe Budget Committee first before coming to Council. <br /> anncilman Stephenson said he had m with Bill Dellen,Chuck Logan <br /> nd Ray Eubanks and discussed t did noth eelethe <br /> oll Proposed were unrealistic or out o line Md. a once d <br />.r bout golf course p and some auditing is n taking place. <br /> felt Counciloshould until this has be completed before taking <br /> action. BdgetSC wait <br /> will also be discussing golf course rates <br /> at its meeting on December 21st. <br /> Bson cams ordinance <br /> that the fees the appear in the o dinance <br /> gi Councilman Michels <br /> were not correct anBill C n <br /> Cushman,Finance Director,pointed <br /> out�t • <br /> 2.06increase in golf course e a ahas been done by resolution he than 1. <br /> 0.49 e <br /> ending h ordinance. President Pope then suggested that staff <br /> 4.18 should perhaps look into amending the ordinance. <br /> 0.68 <br /> 0.54 RESOLOTION_GRANT CONTRACT-(CB 8212-5101 <br /> 7.40 <br /> 5.89 1 moved by C o seconded by Councilman Step nson,to <br /> 8.39 Resolution <br /> Gips <br /> follows: <br /> 5]9A RESOLUTION <br /> authorizing the Mayor to sign a <br /> 1).)5 c with the r interception <br /> Sts <br /> M.14 Calls in the for Riverside <br /> area.State <br /> 10.20 sewer outfalls in the Riverside area. <br /> 1.0] <br /> Department the '• <br /> . <br /> 14.91 REAS theCi Council has recognized the need to prove <br /> 181.43 r eyeeteeo of the City ofEverett <br /> SI intercepting the Ve remaining <br /> 10.65 raw a which discharge the e6no iah Ri r;end <br /> ewe u 1City C recognizesthat future deveerloa ant o <br /> 84.65 1501 WHEREAS, <br /> ttin t Riverside area a relyut s due tc <br /> 44.46 lack of adequate sewer service to theca a and 1 <br /> 2.96 WHEREAS,Nero w11lbe benefits w thehealthand welfare o all <br /> LC.31 yens off the City of Everett as a result of intercepting the <br /> f <br /> 00.10 remaining�utfalis ICC E ciliti P called <br /> 44.01 'the 1 r h R verevde area 01055115;eandle <br /> for the ince caption of t e r <br />