Laserfiche WebLink
f - <br /> 4e <br /> a. <br /> 9 January 19,1983 <br /> NERAL IN NAC -(CE 031-22) <br /> Moved by Councilman Lang.,seconded by Councilman wGipson, <br /> to <br /> ith The Herald <br /> for <br /> authorize Council agenda <br /> g al offrdisplay br advertising 1,1903 throughcontract <br /> Jan.,31 1984. <br /> w Cunene that <br /> end 23 fromFebruary <br /> requested Na[the agenda be worded in <br /> f common person c understand what v taking place.olved <br /> He also said he would like to see more citizens coming o n ani <br /> in Council meetings. t <br /> 4 �.. re gnt Pope felt he had a va11.point avfewould work o making <br /> Uesa Anda advertised vn the paper a crier[o understand.n <br /> Councilman Stephenson told Nr.P nay to el free <br /> to ask questions <br />% au.Councilmanthe intedEverett <br /> £he did agenda pa v ilable fox reviewin e <br /> ntize agenda package xas a <br /> Public aLibrarY. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> I'I Notion Carried <br /> k. COUNCIL BILL N0.831-13 <br /> SECOND READING: <br /> establishing a schedule of plan revue <br /> a end permit Ef ng to private work publo>rdf- <br /> ritht-of-wayen other privae/Public urePer[p c <br /> it nation services performed by the City t Everett and <br />. �� amending Section 17 of Ordinance No.670-80(ENC 14.20.1251. <br /> Section <br /> 3 rdinan <br /> (ceCNo.34901( C 13. 16.030)and <br /> Ordinance No. <br /> ATTORNEY'S CONVENTS-JAIL FEES <br /> CityBruce Attorney,reported on the s of the jail <br /> Jones,pesentingCouncil with a draft fortreview that he <br /> County would approve. He saidthis item was not put on the agenda <br /> he did n there wasany hurry but the Mayor said the <br /> contract,my v tryingtoget this matter finalized be of the jail <br /> funding i 11 would not be ked to approve this to.OS' <br /> but he would Alike oto report back to the County Na[he h.reviewed <br />( ion 6,costs/fees to <br /> beipaidtbyCt a City,Ne then and Section 7,duration/termination/amendment <br /> r <br /> of fees,saying that basically this was an'agreement to argue <br /> the next 10 y rs. <br /> He said the County would awe that the increas wouldn't b <br /> e m <br /> o e <br />. than e ci nleere as some feeshatiquired <br /> asopSince the epiifrom June to required <br />� would know this information by November z negotiating re <br />! year's <br /> fees. <br /> to would said there w no wayto <br /> determine what actual <br /> be in 1904 aand h could agree o Section 7. <br /> Heefelt rthe City should s ithhA538.00/day and <br /> use N¢cp <br /> fox 84-85 and when he new ajailrgoes n line Nen review it for a <br /> more realistic cost figure. <br />, <br />