Laserfiche WebLink
240 <br /> 'I. <br /> June ,1983 <br /> Viewcxeat,wi.6 1soff the end of 23rd Neither the <br /> neighbors in ear ofd <br /> Viewcreat.an 23rdAn uthe developer <br /> were satisfied with this decision and have not cbeen able to <br /> Work out their differences and come upn <br /> with a agreeable proposal. <br /> the Planning Commisrecommendation cabe changed,the <br /> Council s <br /> il m t hold a publichearing. <br /> He then briefly reviewed the items in the packet,including <br /> letters f Sigma Development,Inc.,Sharon FaM and <br /> Patricia Wieenek andEdithFleischer. He said Plat I wasfairly <br /> well resolved and h in 2 lots and a detentions facility that <br /> I was tobe8 times what required. <br /> K ma tephanso spoke normally <br /> the a drainage problem in thea <br /> i; area a T geernco netted with it he yd's liability. <br /> Heudid nnot feel adequate job had beendoneColt tree the t <br /> drainage problems in this area. Mr.Gregoire said hetheat <br /> Drainage Studhad identified this problem are a staff felt <br /> II-,.. <br /> plat withthe detention pond <br /> would certainlyuall <br /> these hi problems but also would not be.an impact ttr s <br /> touthe doe Stephenson sing eared thatan <br /> B mightbe the solution <br /> Y vgefprooblem there and <br /> dtfe this d be looked into <br /> before rain <br />. k <br /> .e,. <br /> After considerable discussion regarding the drainage problems in <br /> this area and without technical staff present to clarify some of <br /> the issues,i a decidedtocontinue discussion along this <br /> line ak he continued public hearing. Councilman Stephan..a so <br />�� independent opnion on the drainage problem would be <br /> 1� 1 bl ng with staff's conclusions. <br /> 1 <br /> II'I I l.man angina asked about traffic conerns in the area and <br />�... Mr.Gregoue said these had been discused: <br /> I :I A lendto,representingtheneighborhood, ince.he <br /> 33 wouldbe'ablefor h continued hearing eek,he <br /> , 1 would suggest that those 1 thatcouldn't be heard <br /> k �E Edith Fleischer,oft5008.-23rd Ave.W reference to her <br /> 4+ getter d she of June u16tham h a cve She she w h d proposal proposal.thedeveloper <br /> untilea received 16th h no felt <br /> mentiondoftlotasize and ow f they extend. <br /> it w t had possible for citizens eoughtgive tthe estimony <br /> 21oulprposal <br /> th '$'}, madehispresentationseen ore firstdto Council. a have <br /> F� She also said the developer's proposal of having 1 large lots of <br /> approximately 25,000 suare feet i eaa o aqua..feet had <br /> ever bean before the PlanningC+moi h concern.that <br /> the developer, n ownerfsold,could and ewould subdivide <br /> �I1 these lots. <br /> fo the eregnong gneureolethat this plan had not been presented <br /> asked Mrs.Fleischer if she felt there would be <br /> Councilman <br /> ddditiov i drainage impactby this development and s replied <br /> neighbors w of convincedthatthere would not be n impact <br /> astheywere Coin n <br /> II, <br /> i���,1peegg'',o <br />