Laserfiche WebLink
241 <br /> .Tune 22,1983 ,, <br /> Gregoire <br /> restriction could be placed o <br /> . <br /> the large lots soFohibits bvviaon. could be <br /> by m covenants e propertythawould make Ne purchaser <br /> • tosingle building a Fleischer commented <br /> thhaashefelt tcovenants had to be renewed every 10 year <br /> and Nva could cause aproblem. j. <br /> Fleisher s neighborhood had put alot c with into <br /> the developer's promises a in 19]9.. Sher sed thequestion <br /> of who is the City"when mr zed to in Conclusion M <br /> planning C report.a She a asked which group t he residents of oft s plat v when a propos.. <br /> an Gregoire replied it would be the South group. <br /> She also asked f the y bonding requirements for the <br /> and• ,equipment vthat will b n the s construction <br /> Cam Gin regoire <br /> is replied that uP Wil[ d. anticipate <br /> The wouldtakeg rd.and didare of any problems.this appropriate. <br /> n <br /> Councilmaninquired abodk the979 1 d Mr.Gregoire <br /> replied since'k time the C sechanged' <br /> d the x [taken a v v bared o khat lnd a e change y,!1. <br /> Por t property.and is asking for a revised tentative plat <br /> • nal. also said the of the Comp an was ,,,„,111,91 <br /> j F. <br /> that the.lots on Viewcreatcould e 150•deep while the written <br /> policy says they could be 300•deep. He.suggested that interpretation <br /> of the Comp Plan should first be determined a staff felt it would S <br /> have a fairly significantimpact down the road. Whatever as done <br /> here will have to be done in thefuture. g((( <br /> nex• tiv felt that Council was bound by the 1979 decision. <br /> and asked that copies f theproceedings at that time be available 1 <br /> end,owner of 40 acres in the area,voiced concern over the <br /> buffer reqlot 1 uirement ithe future as his propertyabut T� <br /> rather thanfeet. n d the , 'C <br /> erequirement <br /> mentas pe . <br /> vnlg Gregoire s vd t e 20'utffer d signat"fl khat apaeared fn 3t <br /> the 79 plan had baenM1left o but would be t back <br /> Beth Arm ,of 5118 27th Ave,. said she had been involved <br /> '� <br /> with Lheabputnveat at dy citizen representative.nShe , I <br /> said her neighborhood g p had formulated a compromise plan <br /> but had burned outal Planning Commissionov r this y <br /> whole v ue. she spot f h for a green belt and compatible _:.� <br /> homes tobe built r [M1 development. S also comments on the4.i, <br /> a roads and tschool echildren waitinghonthe hill for buses. 1: <br /> She urged that:drainage problems,both existing a anticipated,. <br /> be thoroughly investigated and asked abohtd of the detention <br /> '(P <br /> Ponds as children will tend to play by them. <br /> Bruce Jones <br /> said this information v being gathered and it is quite <br /> Passible that the ponds will have to be fenced., <br /> Councilman Langur was excused from the meeting at this time,10:50 p. Pi <br /> Kurt Wieneke,of 5107 23 a 14 large lots would }'' <br /> be acceptable to him of therewassome e thy would ata i;� <br /> thatpway and notbe <br /> dpolthpeed further.said <br /> said he would support �0 <br /> propose by <br /> it;' <br />