My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983/08/17 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1983/08/17 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:57:05 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 11:10:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/17/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
303 <br /> August 17,1983 <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO,830-79 <br /> SECOND READING: fi <br /> AN entitled”Design RRCE sand gsruConstruction ofial tCa nino Roadd <br /> Street Improvement.,Fund 362, <br /> d <br /> for LID 9 n the <br /> vicinity o Casino Road between AirportRoadand ti <br /> Evergreen Way. <br /> COUNCIL BILI.NO.838-80 <br /> SECOND READING: <br /> nitdAReigsting a special c aaction <br /> ad <br /> entitled"Design and Construction Parkway <br /> improvement., 363,for LID <br /> ivicinityity <br /> of us Parkway,Evergreen r to Casino Road. <br /> COUNCIL HILL NO.838-821 <br /> FIRST READING: I <br /> AN <br /> a special construction fu <br /> n <br /> dtu "Shore Drainage Design sa <br /> Construction ,ahrrrns its <br /> Design neonst on. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING , <br /> Mayor <br /> datd that he had requested that third and final reading <br /> of e nordinanceassuming RAARAR Nuklteeiae a <br /> ct 111 <br /> be removed from agenda request of the County Council end <br /> County issvtalow them t study proposal. He suggested <br /> that khitem betabled f t months. Admanastratronand <br /> 1 <br /> the legal counsel were an agreement that this matter should be <br /> analyzed more closely and everyone work II 1 <br /> together toward a seluk <br /> Moved by Councilman Aldcroft,second.by c <br /> delay third and final r ofthe.ordinanceassuming g 3u isdiction <br /> of Mukiltec W District afr 6 months. <br /> City Attorney, p <br /> ,r shf Ton <br /> nDeclaration o - <br /> Significance with <br /> nificance had been appealedandefelttheCouncil it should <br /> proceed W h theappeal a this time. If it decided that a <br /> needed,EIS is this could be started. Any action o <br /> ordinanceshould be stayed until theappeal has been handled. <br /> Councilmen Aldczofc and Langur then withdrew their motion, <br /> halt auera,A aisca City Atto er then said at this time <br /> only a atimony:elaing tq the ne aartr of an axe weals be her. <br /> Mike Roark, <br /> attorney representing the Mukiiteo Water D 11 <br /> spoke It their steir nts that a EIS integral of the Declaration of al partno£a8 <br /> was necessary on this a as caand idirectly e and <br /> 1 <br /> the social,economic a.other yrequirements f citizens. This <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.