Laserfiche WebLink
M 3pa <br /> yyii p4 I''*. August 17,1983 <br /> i . <br /> i� ¢:, direct],effected rigts of citizens in areas of voting,waterand <br /> atment <br /> sewer service,annexation decisions,poulatr e <br /> ' revenues any traffic, <br /> among others. <br /> He felt th SLhbCity e w <br /> kR � pattern, <br /> there no guarantee <br /> He <br /> n d ion by there e <br /> 111 variances <br /> the City wouldsnotresponsible to these people. <br /> dj Caunel3men Overstreet and Stephenson felt reference to at variances <br /> s irrelevant t the issue der discussion and should bestricken <br /> {, from the record. <br /> i[lde reit r w a of relevant but would not object <br /> t 1 to cussionhat the tame. <br /> rlf l eua k then saiditshould be clarified whether or not annexations <br /> CC Ma in the future. a felt this hasaa coercive effect o the n <br /> { y d1 and could a waterand sewer service a clout to force <br /> an e then spoke on the voting issue,appearance fairness <br /> { +.; doctrine oan municipal history an involvement. L the pc posed <br /> d ordinancewill y lead to taking o he arealby the City <br /> 1,,,V1',0 <br /> 1 Everett.a Deputy Prosecuting Attorneyl v <br /> Ed ,vel,p d economic <br /> i Snohopacts rendered <br /> County, <br /> L19 fa If th t nmorer so n mer impacts x dth, <br /> E{3 Iµ! EISd void. If there re more fthanelt t"moderate.effect on the <br /> an EIS must e prepares add self tn trouble if it does not his was al h e t <br /> he ty <br /> ' {{` in- <br /> direct, <br /> ill rect, ndhin incorporate them <br /> mninto <br /> ann EIS. <br /> ng 83 y t 4 e ovezdvnsns <br /> Significance,suc as population aincrease an dilution of public <br /> claration of...- <br /> �� dL�i services. <br /> lI {-ISellers then referred to his brief and supplemental brief and <br /> fi 0 commented that the City's responsibleofficial considered all <br /> impacts de adecision t f th tedto <br /> { significant impact on the environmentcalana <br /> {�4 economic factors Were also takena consideration. <br /> 0 Sellers panted outthe <br /> Mdk i d a <br /> Illly �., comprehensive plan which c contained 1 1 <br /> I Ig `. December 17,19811. He requested it k 1 d <br /> 1 Mukilteo WaterDistrictAssumption.6 designated.Exhibit <br /> 71{. Mr'.Sellers Sha <br /> City'sen ectoxens pthen questioned erickaon reope to swear in Dennis garding <br /> {9 1,r Man-Significance.the al checklistandnpreparatiion consideration Declaration of <br /> if 1� a h could s noebe t inapreparing an xhe fact that <br /> f all <br /> 1 't the County <br /> considered. <br /> uy2333 Madopted afcomprehensive forthis area <br /> { 1 a en ly an <br /> t ry 1, cou Sellers teen submitted the EnvironmentalEhChecklist as`exhibit S". <br /> uncilma3 Stephenson asked Mc ericka 3 v 98h legal <br /> P. <br /> i' sal a replied he h <br /> I making issue was then discussed with 11 <br /> { felt <br /> statingTones they f It this i as ex® A guidelines <br /> 1r. <br /> ,�. and Mr.Level s yinghe dr not interpret it such. <br /> 1 <br /> rft l <br /> >I <br /> .;e.. <br />