My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983/08/17 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1983/08/17 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:57:05 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 11:10:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/17/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
388 <br /> August 17,1903 <br /> said since there has not been any preparing <br /> testimony heask o <br /> it Council deny the <br /> x nae or pDeclara an EIShe ea ri <br /> Council deny the peal and paredupholda proposed <br /> r Declaration o - <br /> eignificence. a said a he prepared a prod sed findings vandie cone <br /> clusiona to substentiateethe ddenial and sake Council to review them. <br /> said although the S review would take a and ! <br /> money, it would a in the best interest eat of the CCtyft r t <br /> be s orx ehpointed iout rit i no k how dthe Boundary <br /> Review eBo willya also that the C made a <br /> offer workproblemso felt the C should <br /> accept tthis offer s will be available to the citizens when <br /> Council action is questioned. <br /> Councilman Gipson ked Mr.Leve would be the significant facts <br /> fers full-blown relationtoand he replied fiscal <br /> n the property i ownersand tenants Field, <br /> a <br /> uestions if theCity1takeathe industrial a leaving theCounty <br /> residential portions. Utilities and services will also be pacted. <br /> Dan Hemmer,Manager <br /> 0£the Mukilteo Mater District,read hie letter <br /> to Council oft <br /> A 17th,asking for a complete study to identify <br /> the impactss created by he r e felt the record shows the <br /> t <br /> City's intent to am the south. <br /> nk B kiltee Water District Commissioner,spoke o the <br /> eservohnnthey had plannedtoconstrue and t t <br /> action negated this this time,severelyaimpactingutheawater <br /> district.d <br /> Mayor Moore t <br /> ted that it probably would no be necesary to <br /> reservoir v theCity assumed <br /> the as trice a the ,1 <br /> City already <br /> already h e <br /> s reservoir 1/3 le from the si e <br /> construction would ben duplication of expanse. 111 <br /> Mike Baker,Commissioner o e <br /> Mukllteo Water District,voiced <br /> opposition t the proposedassumption of thea <br /> water district. He felt <br /> opposition should also be considered as animpect. <br /> President Pope asked if anyone else wished to speak and no one 111 <br /> replied. y '1 <br /> Moved by Councilman Gipson,secondee by Councilman Stephenson,to 'Ir <br /> close the publichearing. <br /> Roll x with a 1' <br /> Councilmen voting yea,except Councilman <br /> Michelson, was excused. '�'1 <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Moved by Councilman Stephanions seconded by PresidentPope,to <br /> t <br /> crept he D Non-Significance regarding the Mukilteo <br /> Water District anddenv theappeal. <br /> 1. <br /> Councilmen Overstreet said a lot of information had been distributee 1 <br /> tonight d additional time was needed to review it. <br /> moved be 1 Overstreet,seconded by Councilman Aldcroft,to <br /> decision to next dnesday,August 24th. <br /> Sellers asked deatin ecietoaa findings and <br /> uonconsideration they decided the <br /> Declaration of Non-Significance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.