Laserfiche WebLink
ele <br /> '2111i'; IiI � 312 <br /> le <br /> August 24,1983 <br /> 1 t <br /> 1'1,1 Reid ocken,representing Al's Auto as planning consu <br /> lt <br /> they a asking t terms agreement <br /> re- <br /> negotiated, wish concludeitand feleissue <br /> here today <br /> is whether r not asiree is necessary. <br /> Untilthas been <br /> I$l ' determined,the property is in limbo. eecommedi g that <br /> they pay or the vacation N pb ed t <br /> o <br /> 4' F Al's. An tffrcstudyconductedh found <br /> o be street.Also,anotherinter- <br /> section on o dEvergreennWay tcoulddcreate problems. Neighbors o <br /> Fleming have signed a petition draftedby Al's Auto Supply expressing <br /> opposition to the e <br /> oPP treat. nt <br /> Y F key point ethe lack o£ v t the <br /> street said hefelt the chances oftav LID for thiswould be slim. <br /> �� asked if <br /> Council adopted the recommendations o the c they would <br /> He <br /> that a limit be imposed f construction of t <br /> � He of commented <br /> that the.owner o£the Suzuki business ewas in favor <br /> of <br /> warding Stephenson compensation <br /> asked about the language as the 1974 agreement <br /> regbe based on 9 f r nature vacation <br /> M andaskedof this would <br /> be based on 1]4 or 1983-84 dollarsaend Nr id i has been <br /> no <br /> tes <br /> f usual practice to use current yr val butthere currently <br /> covering this.fa <br /> Y councilman Aldo..asked ab the City's liability £a pedestrian <br /> 4Y dr pathway were put r and Mr. replied thisa possibilityif <br /> y., 'III <br /> k <br /> this were formally ndedicated�to the City. <br /> p '' rad cattle,representing Art S o of the Suzuki building <br /> i <br /> .. arty,said he felt Ne realcissuelh nw n w ether o e <br /> F ' eeded,but t thea cont t v sueiofhwhich all7I �M}� od conditions <br /> street vacation,fulfilled.r Th.discussion w ern <br /> 11.� �YV i e City should <br /> reserve titan option fox uturebut whexespoint d r or not T recommendation <br /> VIA a thefTAC topreserveL option for a corridor. t <br /> (1 j s em commercial or business 1 <br /> o ern endo Fleming ov the east side is d <br /> �; f eu£elt this area will continue to go in a business 1 s <br /> irectlon. <br /> aid there were 3 and Pec dry connecting <br /> Fleming <br /> end g used en y between Mare no d peck's 1 could <br /> eptly <br /> 5 ea used at cars. These are net aide pCitye. 1 d ou t <br /> 1I,r- sed off a <br /> aningt a not a up an repay p lytta o <br /> '1 I itsCity was acceva r notary smendeg asked to givehepca y alum 1 n for <br /> oref <br /> its value afuture usended that t sty retain right-of-way <br /> I I Councilman Alderoft pointed out Administrationsaying he p <br /> �, I , it asiroad is ieef the foreseeable future and efel i reveair nue. <br /> it aside v indefinitely fo whey it could be used t g i <br /> Cattle <br /> said he felt at would be worth waiting lopmentd <br /> WP iI patternswould certainly ing period <br /> reviews <br /> f before City giving 9P T ecess area <br /> �1 a later date. <br /> y nay r ondemn a <br /> �4f loran Stesbanaon disagreed with the projection ofneleming en th <br /> going commercial. He felt everything isbeing d o Preserves <br /> 10,-, the residential area there. <br /> ry <br /> It <br />