Laserfiche WebLink
1 q 464 <br /> 4 J Dec <br /> ember 28,1983 <br /> t"# COUNCILMEN COMMENTS <br /> ,,a`. <br /> .�4�4 councilman Michelson complimented the City employees for all the week <br /> speedy service provided by them during this last cold spell. <br /> 7 ��'� and <br /> • he'd heard many good comments about this. <br /> 1Councilman Alderoft then thanked the Council for their kind words <br /> and said he wasp <br /> oud to have been a member of the Council and urged <br /> m <br /> tM1 to continue <br /> their good efforts. <br /> '}i 6PRESIDENT'S COMMENTS <br /> evid1nt Pope Nan a unced there wo be an Executive Session o <br /> XYy i`. arlegal matter at the end of the agenda, n <br /> PU <br /> IC HEARING- <br /> ECIAL <br /> PERTY <br /> E <br /> IT <br /> ` Ia Gerry Ervine said aPSpecial BPropertySUse EP emit had been g to <br /> 4� the t of Washington for their proposed office building att <br /> Highway 99 N.and ower St. He said this permit had several c nditione <br /> 3 f which the State had appealed to the Nearing Examiner,whoop <br /> f-"Y'_ after hearing the appeal,still set forth these conditions. This <br /> 1u was nowbeforethe Council as appeal t this body. <br /> p said this property was west of Highway00,north of Tower and <br /> %( south Of 8th t.with aaproposal to e 2 buildings,9600 square <br /> ' feet and 0 parking laces. There willbes off of 99 an <br /> • and a off of Tow access <br /> there be a <br /> signal lightconstructedat the intereectioniof Tower and 99. <br /> Mr.Ervv a said that Condition No.2,which the aplicant is appealing <br /> requires that a 6'high chase 1 k fence shall b located on the t <br /> J <br /> to northernortion of the subject ipro exty directly south and ad2ac <br /> the landscape barrier mentioned in Condition o.1. They <br /> appealing t lace the chain link fence 0n the northerly property <br /> a line of he subject property outside the landscaped area. <br /> 1 Ervine <br /> rep Gipson asked if the fence could be shorter than 6'andd18 <br /> 1 rvine replied this al-1 be possible,although Lbt 6 fences w <br /> �� allowed i residential-1 sones. e <br /> i' 'I resident P en asked if a fence c ldba eliminated completely <br /> e. and again Mr. <br /> thervine said toconditioncouldbe stated <br /> manner <br /> this me r <br /> fencebut would provide m security <br /> de <br /> y fox the....dents in the <br /> area. Condition No. which is also appealed,states that there <br /> Mshallo right-hadturns from thh6 a propertyonto Tower 8 <br /> �y t The State nis requesting that right-ha be permitted as theyt <br /> feel ma of clients a thewill also be going t0 <br /> 4 the CommunityCollege directly totthe west. <br /> I <br /> n to a Councilman Overstreet,Mr.Cameron 1 a College <br /> h by C ev tray 0 said <br /> and the approximately unity College a peak fficeproblm a tra Sn t xnin9 <br /> i'''q � t thea intheafternoon.e H he ORBSfelt <br /> traffic occere rs <br /> urn <br /> W = one,butthere a e peak 1c. that would interferetor <br /> u <br /> f Increase Community College xaffic.es a fe t a right h <br /> would abelnoeproblm. <br /> E and t <br /> """���fffbbbr i <br />