Laserfiche WebLink
465 <br /> December 38,1983 <br /> tiro ErVine Said Condition No.kl is c with a <br /> no then op9 proplotserties. <br /> H said here isnanc nimprovedcu xecardede <br /> access to ilea,Assistant have a used forua numbof years. <br /> CityHe said Attorney,had change i the <br /> wording o Condition No.21,which would perhaps be satisfactory <br /> o the appellant. Mr.Iles said he had provided this type of <br /> t subject property shall not be developed t <br /> preclude improvements perfect access rights k private <br /> residents t the n tshould their f access be obtained. <br /> eventIn the there <br /> eoaare improvements to establish the <br /> ss <br /> thereshallbe maintained o the um of 9'of <br /> accessprivate an a subject property." <br /> oilman o suggested khat is the acc ae e <br /> fire applicant couldeprovide a gate in he Tenceefoxmtheix9uae. <br /> Mr.Ilea said he could insert this in the amendment. <br /> Leenard modified in any <br /> representing the DSNS,ea.if these items are <br /> any way it will enbance the community. This property <br /> privately-ownedin and only leased by the State. He pointed out <br /> e <br /> thahad the private ow made application for building <br /> construction,he would have gone only through the regular <br /> building process, <br /> r ,but because it was n ate agency, he code <br />.one, requires apublic hearing and Special Property Use Permit issuance. <br /> He said the title policy shows no road on the property <br /> referred to under Condition 21. if the fence were not <br /> installed to the northofthegreenbeltdit would disappear quite <br /> quickly aptp'M1azo use of as r be access. He d1£agree with the <br /> Y Y's recommendation ewosding o Condition 31. <br /> are <br /> City <br /> Stephenson said there could be a ed <br /> e <br /> whereby there would be access c <br /> s through the f to these private <br /> gag homeowners and Mr.Fray°felt it would reduce the property value <br /> to the private owner. <br /> pointedHe o the S appealing No.9,which required no <br /> figt turn t Councilman Overstreet asked why some- <br /> uldnneed togoto was <br /> college from the St facility. <br /> one Pray°replied students a eachersareceiving <br /> grants through the Sm <br /> also seniors and handicapped who <br /> would need o perk at the college.e <br /> eain pointed out the fence issue is for the security and <br /> safety of the neighborhood and would h very difficult for the <br />'ler' thetfence,e to maintain the landscaping unless it were on the inside of <br /> ved by Councibnan Michelson,seconded by Councilman Gipson,to <br /> close the public heazig. <br />• <br /> eaident Pope asked i£anyone further wished t speak and n <br /> replied. o one <br /> Noll was called with all Councilmen voting yea. <br /> ag Motion Carried <br />