Laserfiche WebLink
tq'>' 966 <br /> i <br /> a December 28,1983 <br /> O <br /> RESOLUTION <br /> #t <br /> hs Moved by Councilman Overstreet,seconded by Councilman Aldcroft, <br /> $ to adopt Resolution No.2.1. <br /> �bjil <br /> Moved by Councilman Overstreet,seconded by Co Stephenson, <br /> that Condition 21 be amended a follows: The matter of resolving <br /> ti3 the access issue i a private am r between the private property <br /> ace Examiner's <br /> wart an the ownersof the subject property. The <br /> Y C li HeHearing trequirements as they relate this issue may <br /> FX possibly place theCityin the position of either having i solve <br /> 14: the issue itself or precluding the e <br /> p of t from advancing." <br /> r <br /> Now,therefore,Condition 21 should read as follows: "The sub3ect <br /> E property shallbe to precludeimprovementsto perfect <br /> I a rights to private residents the n should their right <br /> of access be obtained. <br /> tha the event there are imprmovemento to <br /> establish the access,ethe shall be maintainedaa.a inimum f five <br /> of landscaping b access tc private parcels to the north <br /> P and the subject property,or,cif ace is through the subject <br /> ,f property parking lot,a shall ebesplaced in he fence by the <br /> applicant to facilitate access. <br /> 3 (toll was calved on the amendment with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> 1 Amendment Carried <br /> Moved by Councilman Overeek seconded by Councilman Gipson,to <br /> i,j1 rescind Condition No.Oai <br /> as follows: The 9 Hearing Examiner require- <br /> ment <br /> e- <br /> vctive. There is a need todaccess a to <br /> ' ' accommodate people from N. C.and others,as well as to better <br /> serve the proposed facility on subject property. <br /> 3[ Now,therefore,condition No.4 is hereby rescinded in its entirely.' <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes,except Councilmen <br /> kGangue,Stephenson andAlderoft,who voted no, <br /> )�I,t Amendment Carried <br /> alled on <br /> ion No. <br /> Roll WHEREAS,application <br /> was made2for as:: : <br /> eed as sq.o£Highway <br /> (A 99 North end T and <br /> REAS,a public ring was held before the Land Use Rearing <br /> { on November1 8983,and at this hearing public testimony <br /> ;Ji was received;a d d <br /> WHEREAS,theHearing Examinerahereby <br /> findings and nconclusions,an <br /> issued a Spa Property U t for the above-described use with <br /> 1;11:3''. <br /> , F,:- ten my threecconditions which arm attached:a <br /> 9 WR REAS,S pulicz,t vs appealing pnnSitlona No.2,9 and 21 <br /> 4{'. of the 0eary g ere decialon:and <br /> l 't <br /> t ' <br /> 4.7'.),4,,' <br /> 4ij'.,.' <br />