My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984/01/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1984/01/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:02:39 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 11:17:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/18/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> s If <br /> January 18,1984 <br /> 11 1 <br /> services. It then distributed the public servicefunding to 6 <br /> services,4 f which r at the same service delilief and the <br /> Abuse, <br /> Program.ental Th Mediation slubew scexpaape nd.trnclude some <br /> staffing beyond the r payments and x Open r Theer is <br /> II project. Th Girls <br /> fythe f distributed among 11 <br /> e o f whf O areEverett Gospel n he <br /> areas, <br /> edac s Adult ay= aunt As t ulcae r Mission <br /> sdin <br /> some of the other p and the 2 n programs the committee <br /> recommending less ot0ethe neighborhood reae a$125,949 <br /> remaining [the other programa were funded was The <br /> equally <br /> among the 4£neighborhoods. He said they did not recommend <br /> varying amounts each neighborhood as they did lc t year. The <br /> first 3 neighborhoods w funded d 1 a priority <br /> neighborhood w ed. neighborhoods funding,we up over <br /> a year <br /> f K and <br /> 2 sant blockwgrant <br /> . t said fundingehas wanted <br /> terrnt that the <br /> schedule261 <br /> t and lower cost budget than an other cityinhe ace, said <br />{, committeehopeduntil w 48 999r helping th <br /> II{ the <br /> with other sources of funds from within the City. <br /> Councilman <br /> Pope questioned the em amount neighborhoods <br /> ain1982 they received 5167,000,83wee$164,000 and now this <br /> year down toHe they had funded <br /> a <br /> social services rather heavily andrheafelt that sidewalk. <br /> improvements in eighborhood were probably more important <br /> than some of the social services. <br /> ! Councilman Morrow asked about <br /> the Pinehurst areaKoenig, <br /> n <br /> of the Planning <br /> resolution PlnniDepartment said the neighborhoods in this <br /> designated because of income level. He said <br /> Pinehurst is a potential area when these other areas are completed. <br /> Councilman Morrow <br /> then said he felt the Cit„should be responsible <br /> e <br /> for the streets,curbs and gutters rather than come from the <br /> block grant funds in these neighborhood.. <br /> Councilman L s questioned money being g new <br /> social <br /> ed n <br /> agencies who the total amountwas reduced andMr.Koenig <br /> I repliedfederal funds had cut from many social service <br /> agenciesso more of <br /> these people <br /> were asking for help. <br /> Councilman Overstreetarrived a this time. 1 <br /> CouncilmanGipson <br /> nedxn neighborhoods p the <br /> hre year 2ighborhoodsgetth <br /> year and neighborhoods receive monies rex w <br /> ay <br /> ha would be a largeran[ a better improvements could <br /> mase. <br /> Shannon then replied that this would be difficult to okay [ <br /> this time without having a meeting of the committee. <br /> Hoenig pointed out that a motion a b made t t designate <br /> enl,amount Of m any neighborhood,butjustdesignate a limp <br /> these ecisi0n a neighborhood <br /> would get lwhat amount,,Council <br /> shmotion went down to defeat. <br /> President Stephenson then asked <br /> if all of the funds f last year <br /> were used o would there bet leftand Mr.Koenig replied there <br /> somewemonies left in f thea <br /> neighborhood Projects because 9 <br /> not all of the bills had come an for these improvements. 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.