Laserfiche WebLink
1] <br /> January 18,1904 ! l <br /> xvchelson then questioned whether s e � <br /> councilmen <br /> service agencies were enot aw under some of <br /> .'4 <br /> social perhaps h received fundsfromHuman Needs which would <br /> be duplicates abythe City. <br /> mr.Shannon said bcauser because o the economy today the committee <br /> had changed from and rick 1 <br /> pe funding to 1 <br /> services. <br /> 1atMillerr,,of 3412 Federal,complained of the procedures <br /> Virginia <br /> by he c ittee. She said pressure was brought o {a <br /> to process rapidly and this v exactlywhat happened. She 311 <br /> pointed t i the quidelineasset by UD priority 41 was 1 <br /> improvement o residential ne.ighborhoode and expansion o lei <br /> housing opportunties,and this did not happen his year. y <br /> ChairmanSteve of P GardneNNeighborhood,said the 1 <br /> neighborhoods had pane down to 168 from 78. said the <br /> $31,000 is not sufficient to as any type of improvement in <br /> he neighborhoods. He said <br /> the$300,000 block grant fundal that <br /> have been set aside to beueed for the Senior Housing p <br /> d improvement of downwn etre is takes t much <br /> Wore <br /> he neighborhoods. suggested the City match <br /> the amount of <br /> money for street projects in each neighborhood. <br /> of 551 Pilchuck...,pointed out that inner <br /> neighborhood the$31,000 would not be adequate to do another <br /> block o he said Maple v used by passenger cto ' :. <br /> f Moid the heavy tuck traffic o Walnut. a is alsor2 large <br /> vvelopments going v that willchannelon to Maple so that v F., <br /> will be a very busy street. <br /> In answering Councilman Gipson's question.about only 2 neighbor- <br /> hoods sou receiving funds this year,she said the neighborhoods <br /> would lose interest if they did not have a project to work on <br /> each year.Carol eNF` <br /> l Davis,of 925 Pine,felt that sine the C Program had <br /> been in effect£ora a years now,there shouldbe mons coming y4 <br /> back into the fund and she suggested taking some monies from the <br /> IP.program and give to the nevghb0rho0da. i <br /> roNy M of 2305 Maple,said they F spent many hours 1 <br /> reviewing the sidewalk problems as there wase many children and l+� .i <br /> elderly people walking in t area. She felt the monies shouldgo s8 <br /> o the neighborhoods andht the 108 allowed for the agenciesthis + <br /> to had reduced the neighborhood monies to find other ^fib;_.,,'. <br /> Gail Chis of 4601 S.4th,also objected t the procedures used }4� <br /> by committee.the hShe a s didn't thin„it w correct I <br /> e theCHIP program lfund arentals,that itshould only be <br /> �kl`4 <br /> home owners. 'tR� <br /> Winspear,el 2ie3 VVctor Pld.o ale complained that Ne $1, <br /> neigFborhooas we a cev ing xe ed wt thus year. k;d� <br /> aldart,.o£2913 N Marine View Dr.,said h s the <br /> Brad c Executive Director of the Ned C Adult C Center. Th , <br /> eefac est was for <br /> ds theaownertheir <br /> re9 tedcenter. <br /> themeta rsaid <br /> emodelthey <br /> anewere <br /> amallleasing <br /> erea. 4 y3.p <br /> h facility an iS <br />