Laserfiche WebLink
we <br /> 55 <br /> r <br /> February 15,1904 <br /> The regular meeting of the Everett City Council w cll.t <br /> order <br /> in Workshop Session bh15,.984,in the Hecond <br /> Floor Conference Ro with PresidentStephenson <br /> presiding and all 1 <br /> Councilmen in attendance <br /> rept Councilmen 0 , <br /> who x Also present e <br /> sent w members <br /> Tanis Marsh,Chuck Moser,Hob Hummel,John Friel and Gretchen Elhffer. <br /> WORKSHOP-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL POLICIES <br /> Sohn Friel,Planning <br /> Chairman,nda <br /> if background and <br /> review £preparation this document,antouched uvarious <br /> areas £ ncontroversy <br /> encountered, uch asthe <br /> duplex <br /> nsityandgrouphmes. shown designating thevarious <br /> zoning areas <br /> l04 he City as wella map showing v single family <br /> yand. aidte Commission <br /> on lotion to make this <br /> policy a part of the c mp Plan u <br /> e. <br /> answerIn aPresident <br /> dtStepann regarding theduplex issue,Tarrepliedb „ is now <br /> by the Planning Depattment except with special criteriaregulating <br /> concentration,location,site d building design would <br /> be <br /> applied t allow duplexes in R-2z s. Itis felt his iguld <br /> result in more quality control <br /> u� commcommentedel then commented this was flexible to allow beat use of the <br /> iera� f� <br /> Councilman Gipson asked if builders andevelopers had been notified <br /> ad <br /> d hattended <br /> the hearings and did have a understanding <br /> e <br /> of this process dan Hr Hummel said they had nett atnded or offered <br /> constructive are n objecting to the generally. . }{1' <br /> Friel s their participation a f'. <br /> eededhandhw ed. However,the only contacts have <br /> be.inaa negative sense. f,Ai <br /> Councilman <br /> the ld <br /> Gilman Gipson felt part of this negative attitude was e o <br /> City's rejection .some o good projects looking at the <br /> quality of the project. • <br /> .� <br /> Councilman Pope suggested het a joit letter bbII ntte to • <br /> contractors adeveloperst <br /> from the Planning Commission Council <br /> the,askint t <br /> tend a workshop and/or h heir comments <br /> C.be heard anddiscussedp nor to the time set for decisin-making. <br /> Viola Our..., <br /> t <br /> f 551 Pilchuck Path,c that the neighborhood <br /> people had also invited developers to their meetings but theydid <br /> t come. <br /> Councilman Morrow commented on the hours o volunteered by the <br /> Planning Commission members a et it would not right for <br /> Council to ask them to re-do this a vafter a e inat the <br /> last e to criticise. He felt itwa up to Council to tackle this <br /> Problem. <br /> pointed out to were <br /> try..t that ocriter ass ouldebevdeveloped to allow <br /> other uses in singlefamily neighborhoods. <br />