Laserfiche WebLink
107 <br /> • <br /> March 21,1994 *, <br />• <br /> Tanis Marsh,Planning Commission member,asked i£there was a policy <br /> who may or may not attend subcommittee meetings. If there <br /> wae t, suggested that perhas should be eelo d s there was <br /> a recent circumstance that d have teen avoided with such a policy. <br /> . <br /> President Stephenson said this <br /> has been at the option of the Council <br /> president. <br /> Steve of the P Group,reported that <br /> approximately half of the ar quiredfa s had been obtained <br /> 44 <br /> and hopefully they would have the balance by t ed nth <br /> to call fora public vote on the Navy home Porting in Everett. <br /> COMMENDATION AWARD <br /> Fire <br /> Chief Doug McNeil resented D m Subitch a commendation....a <br /> fori <br /> h assistance at a scene of a critical accident on February 23, <br /> 1984,and alsor hist dedicated and }&valuable contributions to the <br /> EMS system in the City of Everett, <br /> 4.4) <br /> ILY <br /> SINGLERESIDENTIAL POLICIES 4•41Counoilmen Morrow,Chairman of the council committeeIlf <br /> develop specific comments on he policies,re thefollowing nstatement. <br /> Everett <br /> vappreciates the he effo a f Planning y 1 <br /> Commission andthCouncil <br /> the participants v the lopment of the Single <br /> Area <br /> Family Residential Are Policy Element of the General Plan. We have 1 r,* <br /> conducted three public hearings and received written common the <br /> ended policies. Becauseof concerns raised during our sreview, �44 <br /> we comm ac the pelicie back to the Planningomission for <br /> !,g <br /> e returner tion. Please consider anynewnormation we received <br /> and such newour informationas you may gather.in making revisions through- <br /> out <br /> the document. There are serveral specific concerns of Council rip,�4 <br /> t <br /> w hope you will consider. n 14 <br /> 1. Policy Section .A.2.and reface and Sects Ig �J <br /> Council has insufficient information a this time to determine • <br /> whett <br /> her o of duplexes o ached housingshould be allowed in <br /> Planned Developments dna PRIV a but not on existingplatted <br /> esion should <br /> developf peciificniamily nformationareas sand ordinanceereCn endatvons M-S, <br /> 1)0i <br /> Subdivision,and PRD Ordinances)by considering a least <br /> the following - E <br /> 1) Preservation <br /> of environmentally sensitive land <br /> o <br /> 21 s nf adequate housing.opportunities in the community <br /> 3) Demandfor various housing types <br /> 41 on of affordable housing <br /> SI Compatibility with the surrounding <br /> ounding neighborhood <br /> Managing <br /> i1acts <br /> 1) Density changvmp <br /> 8) n f change <br /> 1f <br /> 2. ic <br /> Section IV PlannedDevelopments <br /> eu ose othe'planned developments"is to provide for a <br /> 'flexible design"of residential p olects,yet the Proposed <br />• policies seem quite restrictive in terms of: <br />