Laserfiche WebLink
108 <br /> 1 I <br /> March 21,1984 <br /> 11. <br /> I -Predesignation of sites: This could eliminate some sites <br /> -Base density, Same as regular subdivision and does not <br /> offer any incentive for a more complex Process <br /> -Housing type; Allows only single family detached <br /> The Commission should reconsider this section in terms of <br /> providing a format process or framework which the planned I <br /> development applicants can work with tajwwwwt property owners/ <br /> neighborhood to achieve a high quality housing enVironment. <br /> Consideration should be given to mandating the current voluntary <br /> procsa urnizos iv project review, ft)neighborhood meetings <br /> prior to public hearings. <br /> 1 <br />. I 3. Policy Section -Project Density Calculation <br /> Recommend that Planning Commission reconsider the policy on <br /> Project Density Calculation in light of the existing City <br /> sensitive land-may be achievable by methods less severe than <br /> those proposed in this policy. <br /> 4. Policy Section Designation of Environmentally Sensitive Sites <br /> Recommend that the policies incorporate the concept of reliance <br /> on actual field data to identify the specific boundaries of <br /> environmentally sensitive sites at the project review stage. <br /> 5. Policy Section ry.A.4 Deg.22;1.eijalhlrEutl:cent to single <br /> Recommend that this policy be refined to provide flexibility <br /> during development of comprehensive plan for annexing areas when <br /> other factors would indicate non-single family uses are <br /> POtentially more appropriate. <br /> 6. 11=enod,,,that Planning Commission consider revising the propose, <br /> Li to incorporate references to the use of.e Southwest <br /> Everett Plan in that area of the City. <br /> Moved by Councilman Pope,second.by Councilman Michelson,to return <br /> the proposed single Family Residential Policies document along with <br /> the suggestioro set forth in the statement developed by.e Council <br /> Committee to the Planning Commission. <br />; I <br /> President Stephenson asked about roe section that referred to <br />,1 ordinances and Councilman Gipson,member of the committee,explained <br /> they felt implementation was the key and it was necessary to have an <br /> idea what these ordinances would look like. <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked if the ordinances would be voted on <br /> separately from the policies at a later date and Jim Iles,Assistant <br /> City Attorney,replied yes. <br /> Viola Oursler wanted to know why R-2 sones wet.e not included in sentinel <br /> that referred to duplexes or attached housing not being allowed on <br /> existing platted lots in single family zoned areas and Councilman MOM. <br /> replied this involved density and the committee was not prepared to <br /> deal wi.this but they wanted the Planning Commission to know they <br /> were very sensitive to R-S and R-1 zones. <br /> 1 1 Gail Chism asked wron this goes back to the Planning Commission would <br /> the entire document be subject ro public heating or just the sections <br /> dealing with R-S and R-1 a.President Stephenson replied that would <br /> be up to the Commission. <br /> Roll was called on the motion wiro all Councilmen voting Yes. <br /> 11-1 I Motion Carried <br /> 11.11 <br />