Laserfiche WebLink
139 <br /> April 11,1984 <br /> He said t Public into <br /> had this a y <br /> ked Herb Bou LI <br /> AssistanubliWorksDirector,to comment. <br /> uckenned the basis a rused by the <br /> Public Works Traffic Engineering determine <br /> ere projects and oriies. are al <br /> sarwith other departments to see if y have work plan <br /> It <br /> for a particular street. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS 1,: <br /> Budget Committee Chairman Overstreetreported they ham <br /> reviewed the March statement end the City's finances seemed <br /> to <br /> be in good order. <br /> councilman Morrow made the following <br /> remarks: <br /> would81 <br /> like t make a brief statement regarding my reflections <br /> over the past 3 months e ounce <br /> the t being <br /> thio <br /> came to ask r belongs ltos people who inhabit <br /> itcountry,believe tthat san am quite confidentourCouncil subscribes 11 <br /> o that philosophy as we i._i <br /> I am troubled by o 1 i'. <br /> the sensitivity necessary toodeal withthose who <br /> have different <br /> ck F.. <br /> . objectives than theestablishment. Peoplecandisagree and not be <br /> sagre Everett <br /> directto have legislationabyathe initiative andEv <br /> That <br /> referendum Pif shduldthrbe oughrthe ed aproper petition gathering procedure. 1. <br /> representativeprocetgovernment for and by the nd pp ,ected as i of <br /> direpears to be cted Nose whoasignedin amount of the petitionint ng. /n fact I have been I <br /> approached by t visuals who have been cal a 5i <br /> individuals <br /> signed the petition.le Should City <br /> 1 <br /> Council or asking <br /> ration peruse the petition and call the esi . <br /> co unrelated troubling matter as last week's proposed ordinance <br /> ' eFana second reading-all in one week)establishinginteriminterim <br /> zoning pose of reting adult-oriented <br /> facilit This nd the singlefamilysidencezoning ordinance <br /> probablyare the t t important n issues N e before this <br /> med bo two <br /> most Wednesday we spent an hour debating <br /> aigenefitity propertyseffecting a sinessman but passed without 1I', <br /> of a ings(1st a with the <br /> third expected t single ek)�atmayy change he destiny ofourCity. <br /> Two Council were briefed n parte of the la a parenwhe <br /> h otherg myself g about it until 12:20 v . <br /> we aid n have t to read the ages <br /> ofewsmal print ening its implications.� ere was v input by .. <br /> he p Planning C There <br /> business <br /> opleetto y.knowledge. we t from the Administra l''''' <br /> li <br /> tion until the meeting began a a Just Mayor,Administration <br /> and Planning Depaknow rtment werelxtart ofathis emergency <br /> nasurone t we '.4`4 <br /> no had n�ugency�inithis ie a for BO The c car i". <br /> were taken <br /> c by language written da approved by this nC <br /> in the ale 70's, ouncvl 4 <br /> s <br /> I` <br />