Laserfiche WebLink
r!I' 142 <br />[ i <br /> April 11,1984 <br /> Dorothy bkoNiven,of 2305 Maple,Pritzie Solem,of 2605 Rainier,and <br /> Rev.Ed Packard,of Delta Community Baptist Chinch,spoke in favor of <br /> raising the gambling tax rather than any taxes on utilities. <br /> Bart Carter,of 2209 71st Ave.S.E.,said in addition to the roof <br /> problem at the pool,facilities such as locker room,covered wading <br /> pool,etc.were inadequate and hoped these projects could be done if <br /> funds were available. <br /> Ray Larson,of 4110 Cliff Dr.,spoke egaineh anY raise in utilitY tax. <br /> and advocated that the gambling tax be raised to 5%and these funds be <br /> used for Howarth Park mairbenance. <br /> Ralph Mackey,apeaking on behalf of the Park Board,voiced concern over <br /> proper roaintenance of City parks as well as the immediate need to restos <br /> the swimming pool roof. He said they had voted unanimously to support <br /> raise in gasbling taxes for these purposes. However,they did not <br /> discuss or take any stand on utility taxes. <br /> ,Z1r,itceseg.,017,,,oi:z17.1,0,1,3eatte:esident,also supported raise in gambling <br /> 4 ! <br /> f Mae Stork,representing P.U.S.E.,spoke on their concern that.Project <br /> Pride.might dissolve because of lack of funds. She urged Council not <br /> to raise utility taxes and to forget the"wish list"and revise the <br /> ! recognized projects"want list.. <br /> T [ <br /> Councilman Overstreet said last week there had been some questions <br /> raised by the letter from to.U.S.E.relating to shutoffs in the City <br /> and asked if this information had been obtained. Maybr Moore replied <br /> the POWs statistics were by County only and not by individual <br /> communities. <br /> Bill Tackitt,of 9506 19th Ave.H.H.,spoke against raising the <br /> gambling tax as it would be imposing a tax.on only ahout 15 people <br /> 0 and was one that could not be passed on to consumers due to state <br /> restrictions. He pointed out they were taxed on the gross,not on <br /> the net receipts and a tax increase would most likely eliminate the <br /> marginal operators and.the City would lose revenue In the long run. <br /> Also,the State Gambling Commission was planning to raise their taxes. <br /> Torchy Ostlund spoke of the gambling tax increase on fraternal <br /> ! organizations. He said if they mere boxed on the profit he could <br /> ," see that,but not on the groes• <br /> Harold Patchett,of 2400 HeWitt,said it hae been established the <br /> City need.a lot of improvements and funds to do them. It must be <br /> recognized that taxes axe here to stay but we must make proper use <br /> of them and felt they must be equitable. He spoke in favor of raisin% <br /> the gambling tax up to the maximum. <br /> Tack Sherin,of 1307 Hewitt,spoke against raising the garbling tett <br /> and pointed out the original intent of the law was enforcement use 0, <br /> t tillE monies and did not mention anything about other uses. <br /> David Mitchell,of 808 92nd St.S.E.,felt a 5%gambling tax Mae <br /> consistent with other communities and felt a need list should be <br /> developed for the Parks Departnmnt. <br /> ittt 1 <br /> St4i, <br />