My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984/04/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1984/04/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:06:19 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 11:22:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
4/18/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
153 <br /> Rt$ I <br /> April 18,1984 <br /> Dale Peters, £909 Wood Pl.,voiced kia <br /> rns over <br /> aplit <br /> streets, <br /> en Everettjobs ddSeattle to minimizeethested that the Nae impact on Task Force <br /> s <br /> o let <br /> one city. <br /> R. nnedy,of 427 View Ridge Drive,spoke about his concerns of <br /> nuclear energy problems. <br /> Delores Grabner,of 5910 Lombard,spoke in support of the Navy <br /> coming to Everett. <br /> Jack azdner said he would hate <br /> 0see y people rejected wherever <br /> they went and felt they should bewelc welcomed by'..Ev <br /> a lot ocontroversy but eryone should citizens. <br /> realizedHe <br /> carefully weigh the balance of the Navy Navy'spresencehere. <br /> slater Williams,of 5010 2nd Ave.,questioned the number o£ obs <br /> the Navyw wouldbringhere as he had read a heard so anydifferent <br /> figures used. <br /> Claudia Berry,of 5]16 W ,felt it <br /> would be destructive to <br /> the ci f the N vy same nese. <br /> eldshatl <br /> McNea raised the question of who was oing to represent <br /> the citizens of By not want <br /> the Navy here. It <br /> appeared <br /> to her that Councilaandpro-Navy <br /> Administration x re <br /> ap d <br /> av Stephenson p u <br /> t that Council has <br /> extremely careful not to come out either for or again.the Navy. 1 <br /> Bro.Bill Brospoke against the Navy and said it was his impression L <br /> that the Mayor and Administration really did not want input f <br /> m if <br /> Y.l.4 <br /> the cathsns and by narreally were against <br /> democracy. He urged that the original ordinance be accepted. <br /> Betty <br /> ary427 View Ridge Duiteuhastatisticsts <br /> show militommeoiledovoluntarcmmny serviceand are a <br /> value to a community. <br /> Henry Chapman commented that at meeting there was a <br /> overwhelming group£or theNavy.the last <br /> dmhe wasopposed to <br /> n the ballot andfeltthe city should <br /> rely on the deliberate decision made by our government <br /> to protect <br /> overment i o <br /> There will be an Els and other p <br /> t <br /> Everett. <br /> Tawny Chapman spoke v ver of the Navy coming t Everett. '.,. <br /> Gail Chlm,o£4601 S.4th,urged Concil to vote Sn the original <br /> petition ad net the alternative ordinance. <br /> Councilman Morrow <br /> felt it <br /> would b a breach of faith i£Council <br /> did not accept ihep titian as received. <br /> wed by Concebsae en corded y lma scrap • ' <br /> the petitxon a e d direct fi :1361: f r, 0rdidancetteday. • <br /> Councilman Gipson said he felt a point of di£ferentthere was the <br /> interpretation of a legalopinion. <br /> President r the nStephenson asked Mr.B of he wouldlike <br /> alternative pPd thnety <br /> andhe aard he would also like to evaluatetthe recommendationsnl e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.