Laserfiche WebLink
335 <br /> August 15,.1984 • <br /> • <br /> She said the property at 205 a Casino R reportedly owned <br /> sag, key property inprovid ng safand c t <br /> access adjoining easterly properties, which had t nldy <br /> public to <br /> a by' melt' publicly <br /> frontage access <br /> that currently tie in the restrictive <br /> o ing Vacated.T <br /> consistent with o properties i the L teffort <br /> allow F orderly ed lopment o e propertieseast <br /> casino Road, the City has required of <br /> t aside East <br /> amount of 10,890 e t <br /> e feet f the purpose of providing public <br /> access by a city o type intersection onto and. <br /> urg 1 the n the:across urg <br /> arty line extending <br /> 'consistent access <br /> other properties in <br /> the tL which h provided public a ,890 se a feet <br /> a been removed have <br /> from the total a tithe tD enbucg land in the <br /> the L e presented e this information and asked that <br /> it be marked a Inhibit fix. <br /> she then <br /> r <br /> sM1 a slides o Casino Roadbefore the improvement and <br /> Casino Road after theimprovement, including aerial slides e <br /> whole area,and asked that it be marked•exhibit seven. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Blair B ugh s v <br /> tthe Development, Inc.had <br /> • brought un evidence regarding their p and their two parcels <br /> assessments.had been reduced to 890,000.0ct <br /> StevGaidos ofHarper and McLean.investors said <br /> they w the <br /> underwriters ou LID bond i and.requested that 11 1/48 he <br /> t <br /> inserted i the ordinance t ance a einterest c with a penalty of <br /> 128, his v standard. a pointed o f anyone a <br /> the assessment x receive a 38 discount offoff his assessment. <br /> • <br /> The City Clerk then read into the records p received from x <br /> W. Phelps said that h representing his father who <br /> lived ao and w elderlyandobviously had n paid any <br /> Casino <br /> Road <br /> the notices. ))d happened to be here when <br /> [Hien n and felts that the 49,000.00 assessment <br /> high f athe tp rty. asked a e defy ral forwsingle <br /> family for <br /> told He <br /> the appeal the <br /> h expired, but <br /> • <br /> that his fatherwould probably t gusiifyp under the State statute tsr <br /> deferral and suggested t he contact County ASeessor. <br /> Protests were then[ rata M.Swanson,Harry <br /> Farman-Garrison and Melvin t0 protest w Read ofrom Rsth <br /> Ruppert, arla <br /> representing CasinoCSqua She said their preliminary <br /> estimate was'$91,000and final�a en was Q10],0000.00.. <br /> said they h e.finished c and sit is about 0.8 leased. <br /> Recently they had a fire in their square and the Pire.Department was <br /> quick in responding and d job and confined it t <br /> the Very ee this. reason, they ould rept h <br /> $10),00000,with store.nt protest,because of 8th wise received. A <br /> Protest was red nto the record from tRutM1t to rearding the <br /> Huse property,snow known at Mini Warehouse.R She Ruppert <br /> regarding <br /> 0 <br /> problems, they had installed eadrainage system this e ea which <br /> them 00,000.00. They a edearea <br /> o <br /> C30L000.00, leaving a balance r of e[0,000.00a assessment. ecausse <br /> neyde not useand only a .partment in e <br /> mini warehouse construction,they are requestiinga r 530,000.00 <br /> be deferred til to cu time as it isdevelopedfor commercial . <br /> The Clerk then read such <br /> protest from Da Rubenstein,representing <br /> Casino tLimited. Rubenstein said he yr not protesting the <br /> effelt <br /> • s•protesting parcel no.8123,saying t <br /> they amount sof hewas <br /> special benefitfora property with just a single <br /> familydwellinghon titcw excessive. Re eq deferral until <br /> such time a the property was improved 9in the of e <br />