Laserfiche WebLink
336 <br /> August 15,1964 <br /> t the Elamrepo�Pa xow nr in the Par Pour Plaza, a cendmminium, was <br /> retia eiaio <br /> A aproteat from 6 Al enaeeafer, representing George and '"a <br /> wF en, as[baa ibcoe melreCor. <br /> Allendee[£er said Gha[ thele w s ec1a1 b Def its to the <br /> TheWhelan hest and <br /> resulting from CM1e recons etion of Cas odd: <br /> conhighest end beat use o£the ience property Gcould haveclinic realized by <br /> ening the consisting at clinic or similar <br /> w <br /> construe withoutwhich <br /> ao ,end sre9a Ordin ce the moratorium He <br /> et ion which xfe rezone, <br /> roper by Ordinance N 55ent b said <br /> rather own in few properties where the assessment had Bane uP <br /> he <br /> original <br /> mount.i the d the <br /> assessment. It was55Bmore than was <br /> defectives in as a said they <br /> basedCity's special benefit analysis w <br /> highest <br /> in a much as they based it upon ty the premise that the <br /> h5 ghhe and b e for n, Whalen property existwouling <br /> residence rezoneto it <br /> and <br /> to the construct a c uif kation, heti[. He M1e here wa er <br /> prisal e retail business there. said there a absolutely no <br /> appraisal evidence which supporta this eproposition. <br /> He said the City's special benefit analysis for the Whalen property <br /> concludes that the fair market value was 83.50 per square foot <br /> before the improvement and 85.50 after: He said in October of 1963 <br /> a ten strip trip i front of . <br /> property was appraised for <br /> condemntion to widen t street, and the amount given per square <br /> foot atathat time was 84.00 <br /> Ile said the special benefit analysis prepared <br /> byCity's <br /> appraser was improperly modified by staffa of the Pubic <br /> Works Department. a felt the credit given to Fred Meyer was <br /> improper for the cost of moving curbs, gutters and sidewalks which <br /> Fred Meyer had built in the wrong 9 location ten f ears before. He <br /> felt the fourth and fifth lanes were constructed the benefit of <br /> the industrial southwest t <br /> area, not for he residentsof Casino <br /> recommended <br /> pad.oHe -the boundaries of the L be changed to <br /> include thesouthwest industrial area as they as ee benefiting from <br /> the improvement. a pointed out the LIne finalestimate was 81.3 <br /> million lens than the preliminary estimate and felt because of this <br /> touction 817,000.00. be ade tthere were the funds to takeing it care of <br /> this. He felt were to take care o <br /> President Stephenson asked about <br /> the business on the property and he <br /> replied that 1t was in a smallo <br /> building[ the rearhouse tie and <br /> Fadt <br /> started a a hobby for Mrs. Whalen, but had progressed into a <br /> small burineas. <br /> ughe then asked l Allendoerfer was a licensed <br /> apps iee[oand he replied that he was not. <br /> Celia improvement <br /> and reviewed526 historical rdinance.ackSSheeuns of id.the Casino <br /> Road Whalen <br /> property differed fromthemussetburg property in that the[could <br /> have <br /> obtained berezone en rezoned,tand[c uld not have obta Whalen <br /> development <br /> permitnot. <br /> she then presented this information and had St marked Exhibit Eight. <br /> Charles Pecan.,the appraiser on the LID gave hrs background a an <br /> appraiser. He a had been asked t special benefit.study <br /> the Casino R or the final assessment. He made a study of <br /> bh property a he <br /> value theproperty with and without the <br /> improvement. tpoi ted lout [ constructed.afte1976, ny developer who <br /> constted o had to t <br /> a covenantsaying that they <br /> wouldpartakeon <br /> an D if one was <br /> 1 t <br />