My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985/04/24 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1985/04/24 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:17:44 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
4/24/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
159 <br /> April 29,1985 <br /> 5 He said In f 1985,c Military T , <br /> rheas Highway <br />• transportation meporAdministration <br /> ca by 45 <br /> requestedJune 15,1985.aThe city the <br /> me i completed <br /> w <br /> March 1 the involved <br /> involved. time as <br /> rich s that At <br /> the acityawouldws mems <br /> would submit a 15 the final <br /> ,k report would b bmittedef <br /> 1985u city would he Federal Highway Administration. In <br /> November of the <br /> t sign start <br /> plans would b mi <br /> navy oandm i would be to be <br /> completed by November,n id N 986 aid one of <br /> toe i ortant points wthe city ill do their own design work <br /> t be important <br /> b hen y [cess ands. •w <br /> After the rch meeting, t employing three <br /> ' consultants to help the council refinement One of the charges they <br /> [ <br /> s of to <br /> work with f t Hili additive ional considerations, proposalso the mited i <br /> t sroad ing around Bas other nor tunnel o 19th St. and the Smith <br /> on the <br /> These sthree were to be looked aat fornd design ess routing <br /> workn and cost fa north t$ <br /> April 10th a second m held at which t t 25 <br /> schedule was changed. the final.d cityto <br /> • Wr <br /> Thee ravel maderef of r includf ain the theselay in e penal c <br /> preference <br /> was very import..her <br /> to He be <br /> recommendation moan to <br /> further <br /> b <br /> e final EIS. <br /> said <br /> a esmnot preferences, aor today <br /> tit <br /> council1n e included a Sect <br /> hole p the project may 5R <br /> not be completed by the time the navy P.P....,arrives. <br /> gz <br /> GmOa wouldhave beenthe of <br /> acheedlielnninggp and timelines without Pin.pi [nre <br /> of deans hr ig <br /> ray of dates during tsex r two the city o city <br /> council input, and6obt lly t <br /> e would <br /> have <br /> been dependent fning, uion <br /> particular t he Wnrwhat timeline wouldhave <br /> been. <br /> Councilman 0 [heft a the Traffic Advisory <br /> and n„ing er Commission ut this ryadee t involved <br /> happened dud t Committee <br /> replied schedule. He said[ time <br /> when C is thea commit <br /> ome Involved before the started <br /> design tois <br /> on which es .21 <br /> boards <br /> outes could handle the traf£c,,Currently,the city is looking <br /> a or to a final l dcision.preferences <br /> after r decision he' <br /> o <br /> Mayor Hoar felt h will sit <br /> reference ofust 15, aroutes <br /> city and nava ity'schoice p e prior f a <br /> beginning the routes. Be felt w h <br /> with the Nay Defense. <br /> [ design <br /> fa <br /> final decision would have[ be negotiated <br /> President said <br /> Preference, <br /> ung nshould be inserted that the council today <br /> has final <br /> review orfinal wording <br /> on that process. <br /> 1p <br /> R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.