Laserfiche WebLink
394 <br /> fi. October 16,1905 <br /> PresidentS e henson said Mr. XCCormfck, the apealwould see.aid he would allow him some extra time and then asked <br /> anyone else who spoke to limit themselves to five minules <br /> Ed McCormick o£-9309 10th Ave. Etrue <br /> said it is t that he does <br /> not abut the proposed development but he v close to the P.U.D. <br /> right of way and negotiations by the developer are <br /> obtain the r/44 and when they m right o way into <br /> e <br /> road, the green belt b ahouse would e developed palso. <br /> awarewas not y <br /> that a ofthis <br /> as <br /> x goingto happen because when he <br /> purchased this house six monthsago be x <br /> congregate c s e facility being constructed. <br /> id about <br /> dhey not <br /> against g none with and n of the neighborsw either,b hey felt <br /> there should be greenbelt betweenthe <br /> residences <br /> and the <br /> development. said with the TOP Food 5 and other <br /> already in a there is much noise n and if the green tbelt <br /> e destroyed, the c noise will exe had talked ith a <br /> official of the Department of T[anepo[tation and van him the <br /> Transportation <br /> the developer had given him,o and 9although the <br /> Department man id he could not give.him figures <br /> P[ <br /> McCormick <br /> ed onwhat he alsld,o <br /> ge did feel there state man an who I <br /> S.property said de had also talked to a sal estate an said the <br /> property would def inately lose value. s <br /> ncilman P asked if the residents would mpurchase the property <br /> as a protection to themselves an McCormick replied they had <br /> made a offer to purchase but they and <br /> refused. <br /> j1George Bade[of 915 92nd S said his residence is directly <br /> across• <br /> from the area to be developed. He said the <br /> real problem s <br /> n d i -5 and the off rampo Mukllteo. epointed o at <br /> .6 someone had asked if a checklist had been made on fMall <br /> and the TOPPS area es <br /> there hadbeen a checks listrior en a construction <br /> cif oe EIS had been made 85madethere <br /> uwouldn't be the problem there is n h 7th Ave. Everyone v <br /> sing it a a short c themall and there any <br /> accidents o the to <br /> development being constructed <br /> just c affic-on nthe street. sidewalks will <br /> e youngsters more <br /> t school m thesidesof t d between <br /> the and the ditch. must <br /> in deptM1M1environmental <br /> e <br /> f3a needed.' Department u and <br /> 92ndSt. o get into the residential area and he felt this was going <br />•'. to continue. <br /> Kevin Barton £1506 01st Pl. S.E.and <br /> out Oath nvirenmentalya <br /> sensitive la starting at 90th e d going n This was <br /> eek at was 10 ft. wide i front of his house. id the <br /> city's drainage plan e o building should be c ted within <br /> 100 f of t m bank.n will nc use the creek <br />;y. to main full for longer period of Mime each year. <br /> ary eeflman of 9109 9th Ave. S.E. also asked that a S be <br /> prepared. <br /> Ed Cutchley s£709 89th S.E. this area <br /> is designated open <br /> space and park plan. Be felt g'that 92nd St.will probably be opened <br /> which will cause additional traffic and because of the stream and <br /> the construction of buildings close to the stream there should be an <br /> EIS. <br /> Moya,a resident in the a concerned about the wildlife <br /> in the area. She had seen falcons, rabbitsa other wildlife and <br /> • <br /> felt if the greenbelt was gone,the animals would leave. <br />