Laserfiche WebLink
595 <br /> October 16,1985 <br /> Bruce Timm of 708 92nd felt:92nd',/ <br /> llonger be a dead end <br /> street as the a ncy vehicles would w e that street to <br /> reach the n regaC <br /> te care facility. els. commented n <br /> o the <br /> intersection of 92nd and 7th Ave.as being extremely dangerous. <br /> eaident Stephenson asked if this development was approved could <br /> 92nd St.be kept from beig opened a Mr.Ervinereplied it could <br /> be part of the concomitant agreement.. <br /> Reid Shockey of 2907 1/2 Hewitt, representing the developers said <br /> McCormick's appeal a targeted existing [tial <br /> parcel C rather than Sr.tJohnson's more <br /> at <br /> Solfe's properties. <br /> Except for his co the[cad one the PUD r/w,his ocomments <br /> speak only of the M Associates property behind hie and <br /> has <br /> •property is not partofthe J on/Solis application and has been •• <br /> onnts on the <br /> e that is presd for ently there bute for has neral ot proved thers. He re swill be any <br /> additional noise with the new development. said the comments <br /> made by M eto rdingthe retention plan were in error <br /> there is o creek o the property they are developing.maintain <br /> The drainage. <br /> plannof tlon thecity <br /> [equires anyndeveloper to m intain a drainage <br /> emergency [vices people have attended m of <br /> they technical review meetings and h indicated any concern <br /> about providing a services to have <br /> a said also that <br /> they have testified 0000dS at all the meetings with r the citizens t they <br /> will n open 92nd St.and 1f necessary to protectthe citizens they <br /> would ask that 92nd be vacated on their property, <br /> Councilman Morrow asked 'hat problems an SIS would cause the I' <br /> developers and Sr. ockey replied they <br /> had already gone through the <br /> checklist and an would cause onaiBe[aeld delay in r <br /> developmenand coat considerable u money. a paid the willing <br /> to work with the community and have been doing this are the 1 <br /> beginning on the process. said one of the complaints was a road <br /> way that was un behinds the congregate facility so they e had <br /> changed the.plan and put the road 1n front of the buildings. <br /> McCormick [e <br /> said he had talked with.the P Marshal who said h <br /> knew o£no plana to open 92nd St. but 1f it were opened it would <br /> sable their capability in fire fighting. o ick said once <br /> the project i completed,it in done and there o <br /> is pay t t back <br /> the green belthe animals and the at yam. Re asked for serious <br /> consideration that an EIS be required. <br /> e by Councilman Langue, seconded by Councilman Morrow to close <br /> theepublic hearing. <br /> President Stephenson asked if anyone further wished t speak and <br /> Larry Ingraham o£u s Associates came forward. <br /> Harmon <br /> receivednot a offer to purchase his property and er <br /> felt they had <br /> the right <br /> ific s <br /> to use their property the way it was Th.maned. Thhad n <br /> plans for the property but they will not use 92nd et.at <br /> any time. <br /> • <br /> Roll was <br /> called with all councilmen.voting yen except Councilmen <br /> Gipson and Overstreet who were excused. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> iI <br />