My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985/11/13 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1985/11/13 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:23:34 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:20:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
11/13/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I • <br /> 430 <br /> November 13,1985 <br /> 2. Downtown road improvements, striping, signs, parking and <br /> signals. <br /> 3. [the[ tudies ton raffic manageme , selected <br /> neighborhoods cans air quality. <br /> Bob• Berg, off, Ouade and <br /> osis%, the c working with t committee, said they had <br /> looked a all 25salternatives with the neighborhood communities i <br /> pedestrian s and also n Deity in half <br /> with any t corridor.of recommendation w 19th <br /> Tunnel transportation <br /> et best of a alternatives,but <br /> navy would to the all <br /> and chose e'themnorth-south <br /> mittee felt <br /> e the most implementable. pointed o t prior t nal <br /> as <br /> os the recommendation, u should be i <br /> 4 engineering analysis of the streets, improvements, signalise...,, <br /> etc.Because only preliminary analysis <br /> has been made asof n <br /> Councilman Ove asked 1f he understood N erg G say his <br /> recommendation Overstreet <br /> urthe stu tunnel/surface street or Berg <br /> St. tunnel <br /> which did n with the committee's report and M aid <br /> thio was rue.co He felt the 19th 5 T thebest alternative <br /> a it did not cut the city in half, i e from the <br /> way to the waterfront and it did t not%botM1 ethetoneighborhood. <br />�,; went <br /> However, <br /> because of the high coat of such a corridor, the committee <br /> to the next best implementable alternative.r <br /> Councilman Overstreet <br /> asked i could give a figure and <br /> I.i, d time line to this r engineering f in ingrecommended analysis he re d nd M[. <br /> Berg said it would p E blyk our ix monthaand coat another <br /> four to five hundred thousand <br /> dollars. <br /> wed by C dad%c ncilman Ofpeon t accept <br /> the'Tranepo<tationa Corridor Committee s Hepout. <br /> j esident Stephenson said he would schedule a public hearing on <br /> F, December 16 to hear citizens' <br /> n the <br /> H report. also will <br /> appoint a committee of three councilmen to[ thereport, the• <br /> input at the F.A.lic hearing a work withCouncilmano Overstreet <br /> rregarding the <br /> Councilman Morrow asked what the time <br /> line was on this and President <br /> Stephenson said there was sufficient time to do this. <br /> Steve <br /> of 3425 T ally felt the P Gardner A should <br /> beal wed to speak on the recommendation of the committee. <br /> Chuck Mahlum of lel Bon representative the Scott <br /> Paper Co. emplbyeea, reviewed the problems this route for <br /> cause <br /> f <br /> Paper <br /> , <br /> Mark House[, 1812 Holbrook, felt the committee had completed their <br /> 'study before the FAA second volume came Out which referred to the <br /> money available for the south-west corridor. <br /> •'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.