Laserfiche WebLink
17 <br /> # <br /> January 15,1988 <br /> III. The City Council rec nines the Nayor willingness[ match Anql <br /> dollar f dollar 9 funds from Neighborhood conmunity <br /> Development Block Grant funds, which are used for street, <br /> overlay projects. <br /> v. y fsidewnding ce so received an 1986 be used for the I � <br /> v. <br /> Thi solution became p rt of t e formal application to[he 5i.. <br /> U eepar[nen[o£tlous ng and Urban Development. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes. <br /> Notion carried. f y <br /> PUBLIC.NEARING-ANNEXATION ii <br /> P66t <br /> Art Kos of t Planning Department said o <br /> 3 19an the <br /> rea <br /> located Council thh of 116th St.ted a l S.E.betweennotice fSRintent <br /> to annex(19th Ave. <br /> 5th n The council accepted the 758 petition o Dec.23rdaa d <br /> et January 15th f public hearing. n S. and <br /> Mr.Kos said the proposed anne had its beginning in 1984 when <br /> the city initiated proceedings t theSilver Lake area. Staff <br /> attempted <br /> temptedar annexa large[a annex <br /> Loop d but efailed to I' <br /> c ongoppoeiaion group o£the advantages of bady needed <br /> to[he servfivices in the.are Consequently this sannexation wasred ced <br /> property o [cre parcel north o 116th St. Sewhich includes the <br /> [iginal eann xatlon pill noon[ ae wely three <br /> city[final£and intermediate resideetval oto between [he <br /> city limits and the propon¢n[e'parcel. <br /> Special meetings have been held and it.wasexplained to property (;. <br /> that sewer facilities may b provided although not limited t <br /> the[followingtwo eases. property o nera may ford a <br /> second,property o desiring Services <br /> for the facility extension themselves. he sewer <br /> on9 process, the 4' <br /> initiating property one builder would pay,for sthe s <br /> extension up front. Intermediate p p m [e wo ld netsewer <br /> y in t E <br /> the co of s ere until such time that they request to be hooked up <br /> to the sewer. <br /> Re said ae uSt has been received from two of the property owners <br /> �y{ <br /> to remove theircouncil from the petition. If the c il decides to <br /> honor this request, the annexation of this area will have to be <br /> withdrawn for lack of,h 758.support required for annexation. <br /> C n 11 1 k d 1 of t[ae sept[ k hra <br /> d i d tot it k d. Xoe pl vet y d d area p <br /> Councilman.Ne row. k h many units were theI�t%[t' <br /> eined into then lake d os plied h e 8 units that <br /> total. asked Nr.Nos what then proposed would be and nni <br /> Kr.Kos replied R- r duplexes. 22 9 1 could allowed o I <br /> the five acres but n all of the property t developable a staff 41£ <br /> would recommend 14 to 16 unite. r <br /> 771 <br /> A; . <br />