Laserfiche WebLink
lsx April 23,1906 <br /> 1. No rage of hulk vehicles and/or scrap of any kind at <br /> any residential area within the city limits. <br /> 2. avarking of business vehicles other than one pickup <br /> tr ex for an extended period of time or overnight <br /> within the city limits. <br /> 3. No storage of vehicles at the log loader. <br /> 4. No dismantling of vehicles or any other type of scrap. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion carried <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO. <br /> -20 <br /> SECOND ANDOB NAL RE <br /> pp AGING. <br /> ANORh NANCE AMENDING Ordinance N which provides <br /> for t NN <br /> licensingofpublic laces of adult entertainment. <br /> COUNCIL BILL N0.864-21 <br /> SECOND AND FINAL READING. <br /> N ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 1197-05 which provides <br /> e <br /> for licensing of anorams, 'Previews'. 'picture <br /> cades'an 'peep shows'. <br /> Jim Iles, Assistant City Attorney, reviewed the procedures up to <br /> s Chiadoption of legislation governing the licensing of <br /> public places of adult entertainment <br /> rtainme and thelicensing ofppanorama,, <br /> Oeviews,picture arcadesand peep shows. Ordinance No 1196-89 and <br /> rdinance 1197-85 pDecember 1985and were <br /> challenged shortly thereafter.. The purpose o£these amendments <br /> are <br /> primarily tO bring the ardlnances into.campliance with t seifvc <br /> deficiencies the judges have ordered.. Iles s sopy of <br /> Order No C86-14V issued by Judge Donald Voorhees in United State <br /> District Court,Western District of Washington forthe record <br /> Mr.Iles also submitted copiesDecember <br /> of the transcripts of the morning and <br /> ening sessions of the Pulic Hearing held on 12,1985 for <br /> .: v orporation by reference into today's record. <br /> moved Councilman Pope , secondedy ncllmemberhive that the <br /> second by <br /> readings of Council Bill 864-20 and Council Bill No <br /> 864-21 are hereby declared the third and final readings.. <br /> i}. r.Ilea also stated that the following changes are alsorecommended <br /> o the public p of a 1nordinance even though <br /> [hese changes were h d by the eothe <br /> element of m[rhicstates n knowingly violates the <br /> Provisions othe ordinance and <br /> 2 that <br /> ordinance apply C <br /> both alcoholic establishments andalcoholic establishmente. <br /> mmendation No.2 would need to be in the form of an amendment i <br /> Section Seven <br /> of Council Bill 864-20 by adding'That Section 11J) of <br /> Ordinance No.1196-05 3a hereby deleted in Its entirety.' <br /> h4ti ;{ <br />