Laserfiche WebLink
163 15 �I <br /> April 23,1986 <br /> moved b„councilman Stephenson,seconded by Councilman Overstreet to <br /> n <br /> a n by adding to action Seven of Council B111 864-20 <br /> theiSection <br /> following:'That Sect n 1(J)of Ordinance No 1166-85 is hereby <br /> deleted in its entirety." <br /> Roll was called on the emendment with all councilmen voting yes. 'ttY�. <br /> Motion carried. ( <br /> The senor m Ordinance which was challenged-L o <br /> Superior Court before <br /> Judge Knight 1s also being considered for amendments. This <br /> ordinance was eubacancically upheld and we are attempting to address <br /> the deficiencies at this time. Mr, lee statedthe action before <br /> Judge Knight 3e still pending but we Peel quite confident with the <br /> [al decision that he h e <br /> rendered and therefore fore the amendments to a,l <br /> this <br /> this are being considered at this Li.. <br /> t Stve Dram, Everett Police Department, adore sea the I <br /> Detective <br /> on thelicensing fees tfor theadult entertainment ordinance <br /> and the panoran ordinance. As a result of the biro sparate lawsuits 3 f <br /> portions of the ordinances as originally passed by the city cooncrl <br /> were invalidated which affected both directly and indirectly 341eamounts <br /> license s. of the courts actions we are submitting <br /> changes v the a ounts of the licensing fees. ) v <br /> The courts have directn <br /> ed that the licensing fees that a charged 1Y <br /> o greater than i necessary to administer <br /> the administer <br /> and enforce M1ordinance itself. The courts have also directed 1@{p} <br /> that the fees be the least amount necessary to enforce the <br /> ordinance. h tees proposed in the two ordinances with the If <br /> exceptionfthe nager and the entertainer follow these directives k, <br /> Pram the <br /> aetective pram noted that the fees for the I, <br /> many d M1 entertainers are merely nominal and do not reflect <br /> the c processing these licenses. <br /> Detective also reviewed the formulas hi in used ( �s'y <br /> determining the fee structures for both ordinances. <br /> Councilman Stephenson asked if any es were g charged 905 0 <br /> entertainers g Mr.f Iles eansw Councilmen I <br /> Stephenson thenasked 1 theCity mould be able c o back anS` <br /> colla f 1already issued and mt.o ogee answeredh <br /> 1 a h fees would only be collected V <br /> licen es issued after the ordinances have passed. n , <br /> Charles Hamilton, r rng s tele Toy, was Ln a"""" <br /> 2 .('. <br /> nee a h the has no �,nencs ec tnie cane. et <br /> Tepo Y laM1emnmtaanoca ea at amen= <br /> . a oo e 81050 <br /> AYES. angus,e N ,Stephenson, Gips. morn B <br /> Overstr <br /> , ops, <br /> NAYS: None <br /> None <br /> EXCUSED: Ordinance . 1240-86 (Adult Entertainment) and <br /> Ordinance No.1241-86(PSnotam)adopted. '.,.�•+ <br /> 5� _ <br />