My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986/05/28 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1986/05/28 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:29:54 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
5/28/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
209 1.. .1111 d-1 <br /> May 28,1986 1'1,1 1d9 <br /> )1 11)11 r.'1'1 <br /> Pru:!* 2g:°1erlidnat'rg1'Zgl.":47.g..!" at Stop <br /> Councilman Stephenson suggested she contact state and federal '1 X <br /> agencies regarding illegal terminations and Hrs.Tracy said this hed <br /> been done but they wanted all funding agencies to know of the 1V3 <br /> PrOblem. <br /> Patti Boland or the Transit Dept.thanked Chief Shelstad for having . 11 <br /> foot patrol officers in the area <br /> it had allevied many of the Transfer Station at Hewitt <br /> and Hoyt as atproblems. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-BILLBOARD ORDINANCE <br /> Gerry Erana of the Planning Department said the Planning 11 1 21 <br /> Commission, after extensive review of this issue has recommended 1'.4 <br /> unanimously the adoption of this revised billboard ordinance. The <br /> ='esclecIXe=n:n2mb:r7frecrl%1:1117ue:hnenttillVdelv,1The'l.1=2: <br /> Commission including: clustering of billboards. Proliferation of <br /> new billboards height of billboard structures, setbacks from .11)1. ' 1' <br /> residential diAricts, setback from intersections, view blockage, <br /> setback from historic structures, removal of nonconforming 4 u' , 11 <br /> billboards and consistency with adopted regulations in other <br /> jurisdictions. <br /> He said one of the changes was that all billboards must be erected <br /> et least 100 ft. from any intersection. Ron Cameron of Traffic ,,';11, , <br /> Engineering feels this will enhance traffic signal safety. The <br /> spacing between billboards has been increased to 1000 ft. The set %.1,1,I'... <br /> 1 5114.1r 1 <br /> back from residential areas has been increased to 200 ft. There are <br /> also setback regulations from key critical view corridors and any '11'1111 <br /> historical structures. ,' '1,''.11..' <br /> He said removal of nonconforming billboards will be set in an <br /> agreement with each company. up <br /> He passed 005 5059 proposed amendments to the ordinace requested by <br /> the Ackerley Company. They have proposed a maximum height of the <br /> billboard to be not over 40 ft. above the base of the structure. ri:,1 <br /> The ordinance calls for not over 25 ft.above the from the base of the street grade and <br /> not to exceed 35 ft. structure. <br /> ackerley has also proposed that there shall not be more than 400 '')'1,1 1)) <br /> billboard faces in any direction within any 500 lineal ft.measured <br /> along a street with a minimum distance of 300 ft. of linear <br /> separation measured parallel to the street corridor between i ''',1' !, <br /> billboard structures on the same side of the street or on opposite <br /> The staff agrees with the Planning Commission recommendations as <br /> presented in this ordinance. <br /> C=1,4,ntclreanglrAid these last minutes handouts made it very )1 4:1i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.