Laserfiche WebLink
It, 1 <br /> March 25,1987 119 IS 1, I. <br /> Councilman Niva commented <br /> ented on the need to review the security and Ti <br /> alarm system at theEverett Library. Councilman Longus stated the 7 <' <br /> Library Board is in the process of reviewing the systems and will y <br /> advise Council if any action is necessary to upgrade or enhance the AA <br /> system. 31. '.. <br /> PRESIDENT'S REMARKS PO <br /> President Gipson requested that Councilman Overstreet set up a,joint 4 <br /> I. <br /> efleeting with the Snohomish County Council t0 continue the dialogue <br /> Sa <br /> between the two councils. Some of discussion would be the `} ; <br /> City's CIP Bond Issue; ]ail fee parks and Wetlands; all current 1 r <br /> priorities of both bodies. _ <br /> 1 <br /> CITIZEN'S COMMENTS - r' <br /> Nae Stark; 1512 Baker, remarked on the mental health residential <br /> rehabilitation center in north Everett called the Greenhouse. he <br /> Greenhouse is a cooperative project of the Everett HeOSing <br /> 1.Authority, Snohomish County and Mental Health Services, Inc Twhich D ''�1 <br /> ill address the Critical need for housing and treatment the <br /> hsmeless mentally ill population. The facility as going to be done <br /> v P <br /> ahead of schedule end should be ready far occupancy byid April. <br /> Upon completion the facility will house 20 mentally adults.ill. The 1` <br /> ed no is to provide furnishings for this new facility. A <br /> B wl-a-thou will be held on April 4, 1907 at Tyee Bowl. Mrs.Stork d y <br /> urged everyone who likes to bowl to participate and asked everyone <br /> else who can to pledge funds for the Bowl a-thou participants. t f qq <br /> 1: PUBLIC HEARING j¶ {: <br /> President Gipson opened the public hearing by p <br /> stating the purpose 1s 1 f 11 <br /> to consider an appeal of the hearing examiner's decision n the <br /> Bourland Short Subdivision 113-05. <br /> Bob Landles, Planning Staff, stated the action required of council <br /> today is one of three options: <br /> 1. deny the appeal 4 <br /> 2 remand the issue back to the Hearing Examiner for <br /> reconsideration <br /> or 3 ifthe council finds that an <br /> ori 1 fact and law may 4k <br /> exist,to set a public bearing to consider the appeal. p� <br /> Nr. Candles stated the Planning Department is aggrieved by the 41.ii. <br /> Hearing Examiner's decision which dented the motion for f <br /> reconsideration of his earlier decision of November 24, 1986. This <br /> decision granted applicant Bourland's appeal of conditions 04 k 05 <br /> P the original preliminary short subdivision approval. Condition pfor street [. <br /> Purposesonand Third dedication <br /> Avenue from Bourlan0 sy to north theCity <br /> line to his, 3+}IL <br /> south property line. Condition 05 required the specific street „111@@1gSI <br /> improvements o Third Avenue from Bouxland's'north property line `11, <br /> o tinuous to the south property line. The effect f the 9f <br /> is Examiner's decision is t0 require the City to either allow the short <br /> plat to proceed without conditions 04 6 65 or deny the short plat 3 1 i <br /> yy j,i' <br />