Laserfiche WebLink
n1..1, <br /> 244 June e,1597 <br /> Councilman Niva asked about the monitoring group and if the permit <br /> should be issued prior to the establishment of the monitoring <br /> y, procedures. Bob Candles,Planning Staffandanswered that the State <br /> +117 lean Meter Pct requires compliance that the state has <br /> enforcement ability through the Mater Quality Certification and the <br /> state lease o4 bottom land. <br /> Councilman Pope asked if the water quality was not already disturbed <br /> as ther ontaminated materiels were <br /> in the waterway and were now <br /> exposed. Mr.Candles stated this was true. <br /> Councilman Stephenson asked if the Planning Staff felt that e <br /> gecropriatlon of$100,000 fur a risk assessment analysis study was <br /> s <br /> dry. Mr.Candles stated that the technical study done by the <br /> Corps of Engineers was a thorough analysis of any health risk and <br /> -. j. dangers to the aquatic environment and was sufficientin making a <br /> E t determination In the Shoreline Permit process. <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked for a definition of riskm <br /> sess ent <br /> analysis. Mr.Candles stated it is a scientific term co analyze any <br /> substantial health or environmental risks. <br /> (1,1 Ccuncrlman Langua asked 14 this procedure had been done any where <br /> i 1 1,1, else. Nr. Candles stated it has not been field tested at these <br /> depths. <br /> 4 Councilman Pope asked if this procedure has been carried out in mare <br /> shallow waterways. Hr. <br /> V n Candles stated it has been done in Long <br /> Y Island,Europe,Japan and the 0uwamish Waterway. <br /> Councilman Marrow asked the different between the terms <br /> 's + <br /> contaminated,hazardous dna toxic. <br /> ncilman Nlva asked about the process to 1 h the public <br /> access I s portions of the conditions are carried t Shestated that <br /> 1 p tyl ��! <br /> t�J; maybe etightening of the five year time Tram should b considered. <br /> 11!, "^ Captain James E. Roth, U. S. Navy, stated the establishment of Isi <br /> ,0Homeport in the Puget Sound Is imperative to national security. In <br /> 0 regard to the public access question, the base t <br /> 111 be opened <br /> A periodically during the year for special event and <br /> a o The Navy <br /> a <br /> 111 be willing participant to establish offu site public <br /> F •. water£cone access. <br /> Ed Lukjanawicz, Navy Environmentalist, explained the dlffeiences <br /> ry <br />' :Pi: between the terms contaminated,toxic and hazardous. He also stated <br /> 11 that It is the amounts of contaminates that determine the degree e4 <br /> danger not always the substance. <br /> (1 Captain Roth stated that Port Gardner was designated for cleanup end <br /> t the Navy will be assisting In that effort. <br /> 11 Commander Rick Nrachalis, Homeport Construction Supervisor, ted <br /> monitoring program on the dredging will be the mostyes e in <br /> ^ <br /> history. The safeguards a d procedures for this dredge disposal <br /> will probably be used in many other situations In the future. <br /> Commander Rrochalls stated the monitoring will be reviewed on a <br /> mthly heals and the long term monitoring will be for eight to ten <br /> years. This process will set the standards for Puget Sound. <br /> 5 iI <br /> • <br />['' I <br />