1987/08/12 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

en SI, 21 1 f,1. August 12,1987 I 3. Kenilworth Hills Amendment area- The Planning Commission, property owner and adjoining I. neighborhood have undergone an extensive review and negotiationrezone rocess Par a comprehensive plan amendment antl contract Por this property located In Southwest Everett. The Planning Commission recommendation has not yet been forwarded to the City Council due to the involved negotiationroce ss and detailed contract rezonelanguage 1 staff Is puttingtogether. Action be City Council on this area will be taken separately t later date end then incorporated into the Comprehensive General Plan: " 10 4. Boeing ComPanyProPerY- o .i.. The portion P the Boeing property north of the perimeter access road and south of the Fluke Manufacturing Company property was proposed to be designated office and Industrial ark." At the Pinel Planning Commission hearing on the Land Use Map, Boeing asked the Planning Commission to designate the property Heavy Manufacuring:" the Planning Commission Y'' left it in he Office and Industrial Park designation. It 1{;, is anticipated that Boeing will present a request to Council ' ii. to designate the site"Heavy Manufacturing." Staff supports the Planning Commission recommendation, but Peels that the Boeing Company concerns andPlanning Commission concerns can be accommodated within the"Heavy Manufacturing"designation le if specific policy language 1s applied to the property. This Planning process would involve additional review by he canning Fk,'a' Commission. IP the Council wants to have the Planning Commission review the request further, staff Peels the subject propertyshould be removed from the recommended plan, so s not to hold up the adoption process of theremainder of the plan. pi S. 61st and Colby Intersection- ouring the Planning Commission review Process, a request was f''''�.1 received from several property owners involving Property south of 41st Street and west of Colby Avenue who wanted a Iih g commercial designation allowing B-2 zoneuses. The property ispresently designated nateed "Clinics/Professional A Offices/Multiple Family,25 to dwellings per gross acre. II Staff and the Planning Commission did not support the '^f yl request. However, the Planning Commission felt that if a 'f high quality project were proposed for the entire block which upgraded the quality of development at this highly visiblea .I.p gateway entrance to the city, that an amendment to the plan ould likelybe given favorable Consideration. The Planning j,l Commission and staff a apposed to a change that would ,a encourage a commercial strip effect. 6. Areas proposed for annexation " Areas outside the presentcity limits which nay be Proposed � Por annexation present the oportunity to evaluate, Comprehensive plan designations and zoning. The designations pya on the map outside the present city limits match the I';� eresponding County Plan designations. Each annexation will oreviewed for appropriate plan designations and compared with policies Contained in the plan text.