Laserfiche WebLink
397 <br /> October 7,1987 . <br /> aublic, circulation,.security, idem iGy a <br /> " public a ceptance, <br /> ode compliance,expansion capability,a c. 'i� <br /> In some <br /> ptS, none of these proposals ideally met all the <br /> requirements of <br /> y sere. saving studied 11 the factors <br /> leading t a decision be said he E and f6 to be he proposal, ' <br /> although thein users did not k om i to Sachs user was to I <br /> prepare a alysis e d they all me theconclusion,gdthat Iii <br /> 16 as net perfect but was the best available. ams <br /> tl aid he believed the lose facto[in any office structure is one '.. <br /> of the key elements in selection of the facility a the city mould <br /> pay for[ whether they use it or not. s. 4 <br /> Chuck Ogden representing <br /> 15 presented an exhibit t the council <br /> which asked 10 about the recommendation. B said also he <br /> had filled in the proposal with$17.50 for off site parking i <br /> for on site an he. ked why this hadn't been made a clear and <br /> the <br /> council instead of.the OS escalation figure put in and Mr. Scott <br /> eaid there was no reference to this being for the entire five year <br /> lease. <br /> Ogden nhehn suggbeeeted that CM1e two coupe ale that m close, <br /> IY and 16, Quid diecuesed ny the it itb kM1a proposers. 'I <br /> Councilman 1 s opposed to this as she felt the council did n <br /> ot <br /> have theknowledge needed to do this and they should depend on the <br /> expert they hd employed to make the decision. t,. . <br /> Councilmen Stephenson asked M Orden when he had been asked about <br /> five year period,had he said he fees would remainthe same and y <br /> Ogden saihe h asked that nor had he offered the <br /> information. Councilman oStephenson then asked if his inten <br /> my a fixed pricea <br /> for parking for the entire five years and mr. <br /> Ogden replied yea,. he is listed in he proposal. <br /> Councilman Overstreet <br /> asked N[. Norton if he'd had the information <br /> about a guarantyhe parking fees from f5, would this have <br /> changed 1, <br /> opinion as t othe beet site and Mr.Scott replied no. <br /> Councilman Stephenson said n one 1s questioning the integrity o <br /> un Scott,the when he was selected it was very <br /> carefully a£ <br /> he cane highly recommended and ca with done reputation above <br /> reproach. Be felt the council should respect his opinion and concur <br /> with hie recommendation. if during came <br /> with the City <br /> Attorney thereateserious flame or other problems found then the <br /> wouldcity[ have to go to the next bidder. Tht's the process. <br /> Roved by Councilman 0 seconded by Councilman N t <br /> accept he r f Norton[Scott as be identified bidders and 66 ',1 <br /> as the nest passible proposals and,that Norton Scott and Bruce donee <br /> enter negotiation° for contract with 16 othat would not be <br /> limited to but would at least include,a clause that <br /> would Speak to <br /> the.availability and future costs.a of any expansion the city might <br /> need in that feciliel, that a thorough structural and engineering <br /> analysis <br /> Ott in <br /> de and e contracta negotiated be submitted to <br /> Everett y Council forapproval at the earliest possible date. <br /> the <br />