Laserfiche WebLink
67 1 <br /> January 27,1988 <br /> , <br /> i Change the stream buffer on Powder MI11 Cleek and any other <br /> stream bank to 25 feet Instead of 50 feet 25 feet is <br /> consistent with the South Everett Drainage Plan <br /> 'PI <br /> li 1 <br /> 2 %Irmn"taht:lt.5h I'Mui=et'a fl'o'ng't h7 n'o*:tth blgunddLanr1'o'ftt: <br /> Property <br /> 1 <br /> 3 Reconsider the minimum lot size for the entire rezoned <br /> 0 <br /> property,or at/ease For the Industrial zoned portions,ftom <br /> five acres to three acres <br /> 4. 'a=niniir p:ope:4,071erna'rilTtelne'eninlprOnv ent'VT:d564 <br /> 4 <br /> 1:en'tJ: <br /> 5 Clarify the building height limitations actually approved by <br /> the Planning Commission as opposed those contained in the <br /> draft of Planning Commission Report to City Council <br /> f. I <br /> 6 Under Item 20, Building Coverage, eliminate the seven acre <br /> minimum and allow the recommended minimum lot size to utilise <br /> i'If,.11f <br /> the OUP f er and any other undevelopahle ARES to be counted for -LI'i I <br /> the purposes of calculating the allowed building coverage, I'I <br /> except for the area in Powder Hill Gulch to be deeded to the ' I <br /> City. <br /> Pr Doughty <br /> buffer <br /> stated that the staff alll recommend on item 61 to <br /> reduce the to 25 Feet on either side of any stream bed other Itl' <br /> than Powder Mill Creek, that the concomitant agreement does not <br /> preclude the use of latecomers agreements at a later time but does <br /> not recommend the other changes from the Planning Commission's <br /> recommendation <br /> 1. <br /> Pat Horton, 3232 56th St SM, representirg the Neighborhood Action <br /> Group(N A G 7, reviewed the history of the group and their intergal <br /> VItC!nerVIsteeetnhe"PIWinng roM0s=T:egmMtenedaPtliOrHning P""". I <br /> I <br /> Jim Miller,Lovell-Sauterland, 23106 100th Ave M Edmonds, stated he <br /> was engaged by the Neighborhood Action Group, to review the preiect <br /> and to make recommendationa to the neighborhood He reviewed the <br /> I <br /> process arid also presented the neighborhoods views on the additional <br /> r.,,,,,mt. by sigma Development. NAG will support the Planning <br /> Staff's recommendation <br /> Sharon Denuth, 3323 52,d Place SW,reviewed the damage that was done :I <br /> 1.! ! <br /> to the buffer zone in November by a bulldozer operator sent in by <br /> Mr Bocek She felt that the owners should have to bring the buffer <br /> area back to lts natural state She stated that 50 or 51 evergreens <br /> had been planted in the buffer area <br /> 'I'111. <br /> Mr Bocek stated that he was sorry for the destruction The <br /> bulldozer was sent In to open up the old logging roads for a 1' <br /> prospective purchaser and he became a little over zealous In his <br /> clearing He stated 51 evergreen trees have been planted in the <br /> buffer area and another 51 have been ordexed <br /> I <br /> ji 0 1,,,Illi <br /> fe. <br /> il <br />