Laserfiche WebLink
90 <br /> February 24,1980 <br /> official. Secondly they can remand the project to the staff to <br /> generate specific additional information. Thirdly they can <br /> recommend preparation of an EIS for the rroposal or fourthly they <br /> can make additional findings and based on those findings revise the <br /> DNS that has been issued. <br /> Following that, the council will have to make a decision on the <br /> alley vacation realignment. <br /> Nary Cunningham of the Planning Department showed slides of the <br /> PrOposed project. She said the DNS has 26 requirements the <br /> applicant has to comply with to reduce the impact Ofthe proposal. <br /> The stafftwas2ery resp7sive to.zequests made by.Dr. Brost. He <br /> 1TX.ggan1'epollgyYg:nteiT=e 11 hapr7,11111 norldbu144X11:enth: <br /> Side which he appealed and the condition states there must be a <br /> buffering of trees and fence 5 to 6 feet tall. He also appealed the <br /> litter problem but the staff feel- the applicant has adequate <br /> coverage on this. The parking are,was also appealed and the staff <br /> had four parking analysis made. ch varied from 72 to 94 spaces <br /> needed. The city requested the Meant to increase the parking to <br /> allow for 92 spaces. <br /> the tall there <br /> Wvegt;ndWIW°,1.—.:f:e2"::gde'rtbeeltueset11 <br /> Dr.Brust's requests. <br /> Craig Fullerton of the Public Works Department said realignment of <br /> alleys and streets have been done many times in the past. He said <br /> the proposed vacation contains an area of approximately 3,950 sq. <br /> ft.and is within the 5-2 business zone. The proposed vacation is <br /> requested to develop a majority of the property that abuts the <br /> alley. There has been Inc objection to the proposed vacation. He <br /> said all affected city departments and public utilities have been <br /> requested:oor::ent ntr to present or future needs of the public for <br /> amen will be required for public <br /> utilitier;nd-seXvines. nne111utio1 No. 1724 requires <br /> payment Per <br /> and/or exchange of property in the amount of one halfthe aPPraised <br /> value for vacated right-of-way. He recommended vacating the alley <br /> right of way subject to dedication of new at ht <br /> Councilmember Stephenson asked about the parking being In excess of <br /> that required and Or.Landles replied that the city has required the <br /> :W,L1T1'thlas rarolg1r afa1111'Og pinalena." f" feat <br /> food places <br /> and <br /> Councilmember Pops asked if Or.Orust's property will have access to <br /> the al..,and the answer was yes. He then asked about cars turning <br /> left onto 61st St.and Pave Davis,Traffic Engineer,said there will <br /> be no restrictions to turning left on 41st St. or Colb With the <br /> n <br /> traffic backed up from the Rucker light,he doubted an one would hey <br /> to turn left. The applicant had been told that if itturned alt to <br /> be a problem in the future,No Left Turn signs would be installed at <br /> both exits. <br /> Councilmember Stephenson asked about the cumulative impact and Nr. <br /> Iles said the city has not done this and there is no ordinance that <br /> would allow the city to do this. It would be inconsistent with how <br /> ether aPPlicants were treated <br /> 4 <br />