1988/08/17 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

325 August 17,1980 adopted or that he interpreted a little differently than the way h 111 they should a interpreted so it is up to council be the Judge tonight as to the approprietness of that initial determination by the responsible official. Brad Cattle, attorney representing Bayridge Development, said this is not a final design stage,it is not a final landscaping stage but rather it is to assess whether or not the responsible official, after his consultation with the the various Public Works Department people,hathe city Police Department and the Park Department,whether }. quantity responsible information,ierred s sufficient determining ofng that sufficient suff y o quality of information and a sufficient list t 29 conditions iro applied to this be tls elopment such that thele are not adverse environmental effects because of it. He pointed out that this property is already zoned multiple-family o and the council should my Consider whether the number and placement of the units is legitimate information. He said when .. citizens come up and speak of the traffic problems, the Council should talk to the Traffic Engineer regarding it ar there has been a traffic study. The wetlands has been staked and is being preserved as requested by the DOE. He said the developer does not object to leaving all vegetation there until the site plan as been approved. He also spoke f oil water separators and bio-filtration swale into the lake and wetlands. He said there could be a maintenance contract for the catch basins so they could be monitored by the city. Councilmember Morrow asked thy the lake was being filled and Mr. Cattle replied the city had requested this. Mr Ervine said it was to restore the erosion and by planting vegetation it would keep it Prom eroding further. Counsaid they so[Pope asked about the removal o4 t and Mx. Cattle said they would replace every tree removed by another tree. President Hive waso c erned about condition 15 which might restrict turning movements toright turn only for ingress and egress from the project. Councilmember Morrow was concerned about having a bus pull out as �tt. the entrances to the project are so close. t s Dorothy Vandeventer of 2012 129th Pl.S.E. objected to the project end requested that an EIS be required. She said there was potential pollution to a large body of water,air pollution impact,inadequate • drainage plans to protect water quality, traffic conjestion, inadequate wetland protection, emergency vehicle access on timely basis and clear cutting trees all part of her objection to the Project. Al Kaminski of 13020 23rd Dr.S.E.complained about the drainage to the lake and asked for en EIS also. Peggy Cla Plen of 2127 Lake Heights Dr.felt that 100 units were too many for such a small area and she thought there should be a fifty foot buffer. Louise Britton of 1231 131st. 5.E. was concerned about the additional traffic,the safety for fixe egress and also requested an EIS.