Laserfiche WebLink
pk 1 <br /> iI 326 <br /> { August 17,1988 <br /> Pam Lux of 2225 116th St. S.E. sold <br /> there is an historic house at <br /> 11309 B thel Highway formerly ownedb 0oeseph St. Peter, who was <br /> active in Everett theatres in the early 1900s. She thought the <br /> 41 house should be saved or moved and also asked.for EIS. <br /> Milt Smith oP'de' 23rd Or. S.E. objete0 to opoenin0 M1Ss a reet <br /> t exiacent to the tleveloDment so Chet the chSldxen c uld se it as en <br /> (yyy1��� exit to the school. <br /> Moved by CouncSlaembex Pope, eecontletl by Councllmembei Morrow to <br /> I close the public hearing. <br /> 'i I <br /> President Niva asked if anyone further wished to speak. <br /> vid Santlamon, 1703 12]tM1 P1. S.. opposed the project <br /> (96 t pax titularly because of the increased trafic. <br /> AMLI Tom Lux thought ...thing an EIS should be required to determine all the roblems now rather than have the developer agree to do ..thing <br /> after a problem comes up. <br /> u cilmember Gipson said there seemed to be only three issues that <br /> �� YYYYYY � L would need to be covered by an EIS, drainage, traffic and density <br /> end he felt the council could mitigate these things. <br /> 11;I Councilmember Pope suggested the Historical Commission be notified <br /> MM about the St.Peter house. <br /> 0 + Mr. Cattle said based on the evidence he had heard et the meeting, <br /> he did not believe there was significant evidence.to overturn the <br /> responsible official's ind de ermSnatt of a significance. h said <br /> the <br /> 1_ ` Pr.L x s comments indicate that f is i very broad concern h the <br /> P + excellent havec for the eliss of their neighborhood, which is or <br /> § excellent cont nfo but the that <br /> before the council is chatter or <br /> ,'i not [hexa is official <br /> h that wasnot properly bignific before the <br /> responsible official in his determination of non-significance. <br /> 11` Poll was called on the motion to close the meeting with all <br /> ` <br /> F I' ' imembrs voting yea ...Pt Council...I 5t...... who was <br /> 4 ou excused. <br /> 1r ' Moved by Councilmember Pope, seconded by Cauecilmembex ...ow to <br /> `A{�� cr <br /> remand the project beck to the Planning staff for epecific <br /> I it additional information on: <br /> h 1. Address all the DOE concerns on the wetlands. <br /> 1+j l' 2. Tot Lot movetl frau the wetlentls to the midtlle o4 the project. <br /> 11 3. Inventory o4 all Evergreen trees,what goes down end wM1at woultl <br /> replace then. <br /> O. r t4tar possibility of five lanes and adequate green belt with <br /> left turn lanes. <br /> 5. [nage plan to be approved by the Public Mores Department. <br /> h <br /> 6. Conceptual site peen owing wing green belt,emergency exxits,etc. <br /> . Investigate St.Peter Home. <br /> II 8 <br /> '.. 8. Information l the mitigation for the need of the 7111. <br /> 1. 215 to deal mpeh the ou children going of school.' 10.61%of the impervious surfaces did not include the roofs. <br /> G' <br /> e iii: <br /> Il I I{ <br /> tk V it ij, <br /> A 3 I I <br /> ['II,'' <br />