1988/10/05 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

401 October 5,1988 4. That$100,000 be authorized and aPpropriatetl a of revenue in the 1989 City of Everett budget from INC matching funds for the acquisition of park property the Snohomish River a known the Maltby Property. 5. That the Combined amounts above of$200,000 be authorized i and appropriated as a source of revenue to,and as a form ofexpense f in,the 1989 Perks end Recreation Budget,Fund 101,Program 57. 6. That the City 0f Everett does hereby certify that the City is responsible to support all non-cash c mmitments to the local sshould hould they not materialize. 7. That any property acquired with financial aid through the Interaoutdoor re Commitreation efacilityOutdoor and Recreation bbeeretained in d in useas an in gre%tultyeunlese otherwise provitletl anticagre'd upon byuch the City of Everett, City Council, the Interagency Committee Pox Ddo01 Recreation and any affected federal agency. 8. That this resmlution became part oP a formal application Ca the Interagency Committee Pax pu ttloor Recreation. 9. That adequate notification has been given for public input and that the rk Board has reviewed and adopted the aster plan for the acquisition of the Maltby Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to submit this resolution to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation,that the City has officially obligated funding sources to meet the grant match by using funds of the City of Everett as outlined herewith. Roll was called with all councilmembers voting yes except Councilmembex Gipson who was excused. Notion carried. BAY RIDGE DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS RESOLUTION4 Gerry Ervine,Planning Staff,stated that on September'21,1988,the City Council reversed the Responsible Official's Determination of Non-Significance for Bay Ridge Development and required a limited scope Environmental Impact Statement addressing Pour traffic issues. The issues to be addressed in the EIS e e 1) vehicular traffic; 2)inress and egress: 5) turning restricticee; and 4) pedestrian accesscrossing. In addition, the applicant is to provide additional information to staff concerning wetlands, drainage, tree inventory, and Monroe x { School access. n Bob Landles, Planning Staff, reviewed the SEPA review process. He saidupon the direction of Council by a resolution adopting the findings, Conclusions and decision regarding the appeal of SEPA determination No.61-88,Bey Ridge Development,staff 111 prepare a Ii • limited Environmental Imppact Statement[ address the four traffic issues;the EIS will be submitted to the Hearing Examiner for review and make a decision on the Shoreline Permit. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the Shoreline Permit is final,unless it is specifically appealed to Council. 1Y;