My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988/10/05 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1988/10/05 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 12:09:14 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 8:11:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/5/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
402 <br /> October 5,1988 <br /> Landles stated that the SEPA decision made by Council today is <br /> the decision related to the required environmental review process. <br /> Mx. Ervine reviewed the updated staff report as it relates to the <br /> concerns of wetlands, drainage, tree inventory. School <br /> He introduces letter dated October and 1988fromthe <br /> Department Oology reviewing their requirements in regards to <br /> drainage antl of <br /> They a ending a oat buffer with <br /> a Pence ea a minimum(or protection o(m the wetlantl Dates. <br /> Tom Lux, 2225 116th Street SE, representing the Silver Lake Action <br /> Committee,asked that the committee be involved in the EIS process. <br /> The Committee does not Peel that the Issues of the St.Peter <br /> nage, boardwalk, and setbacks have been completely <br /> traddressed. He ees <br /> the developer has not been sensitive to the <br /> neighbors or the lake. <br /> Ff Brad Cattle, 3305 Oakes, representing Bay Ridge Development, <br /> theested informationonal availableage to is reasonably sufficient hto findings <br /> that <br /> 'IRenvironmental impacts with the exception ofu evaluate traffic. <br /> ' Gf 4 <br /> Y, _ Moved by Councilmember Stephenson,seconded by Councilmember Pope to <br /> pl adopt Resolution Na. 3072 detailing the Findings, Conclusions, end <br /> Et if: <br /> iSionre gardngBaydgeevelopment.I 4ed by Caucilmembrephenson, secOntledbyCouncilmembr11/ <br /> rstreet toeendtheresution to cM1enge thePinel paragraphntion 2: FinestoreetlPollpvs:ieCouncil POuntl thatApplicanthauiflclently addressed` irconcerns whichhatlreenDry visuffi [aisetlantl thatteaxmeCiao evellable Ss easonable u441cient to evaluate all{ ixonmental impactsttatheexc pilonof txaPPnn. NileteSit tapoxnetion a it able to the Responsible M441cia1 and thea Cituy n <br /> wetlands, drainage, tree Inventory and onroe Schaal aces 1s <br /> directed l I r IF specific Iconhat runs uHowever ther refineCouncil language the fetto th t address Picient <br /> information uexisted as to the following issues regarding utraffic: <br /> vehicular traffic ingress and egress, pdated traffic study,turning <br /> jk I restrictions and pedestrian access crossing.. <br /> and to add t0 the end of the first sentence in Section 3: decision, <br /> ',with respect to traffic.. as <br /> E pall N called o the amendment w1tM1 all c ncllmembe[s voting yea <br /> ��{{ except aCouncilmember Gipsowho w excused. <br /> ou <br /> iI,191 Amendment carried. <br /> 1.'` i Roved by Councilmember Overstreet, seconded by Councilmember Marrow <br /> to amend the proposed resolution by adding after the lsecond sentence <br /> I6` <br /> in Section 2: Fining, item no. B, Monroe School the following <br /> t language: <br /> p. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.