My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988/10/26 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1988/10/26 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 12:11:03 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 8:12:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/26/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I,' ` [ 430 <br /> �1,4 October 26,1988 <br /> Y <br /> (Yi WHEREAS, on October 4, 1908, the City of Everett, Planning <br /> Nutrient <br /> held a Public Management <br /> R o the Silver Lake Water Quality, <br /> Nutrient Loatling and Management Report,and <br /> 41Ii, NHEREAS, it is the Cif'y oP Everett" desire t improve to <br /> LLfi liI water quality aP Silver Leka tl <br /> IS IAreco WHEREAS, the City f Everett, Planning Commission does <br /> i <br /> recommend to the Everett City Council that they adopt the Silver <br /> Lake Water quality,Nutrient Loading,and Management Study. <br /> Iv�I� NOW,THEREFOREBE IT RESOLVED the Everett City Council does <br /> { adopt the Silver Lake Water quality, Nutrient Loading, and <br /> 1! management Study. <br /> Rall was called with all councklmembers voting yes except <br /> I, Caunc3lmember Stephenson who was excusetl, a <br /> gA <br /> Motion carried. <br /> p <br /> y +,.,: LID 727,16th ST.S.E.ADMINISTRATION <br /> k 1II f San Jones of Public Works,reminded to council that on Oct. 5th, <br /> the council held a workshop to discuss two issues that have stifled <br /> [ the progress of LID Na.727. The first issueconcerns a significant <br /> Ilse in the cast estimates since the LIO was formed. The second <br /> issues has do with whether <br /> the <br /> ot <br /> ,G I. concomitantt agreement ht of „ Based eDann the councciinally le'sb edonated discu sign oat the <br /> 43 1 workshop, there appear to be three basica alternatives in resolving <br /> the two issues: <br /> 1. Council takes no action. staff acquire only those rights of <br /> Ir <br /> way that were originally <br /> intended t b purchased, <br /> I is <br /> construction bids are solicited and the construction contract <br /> war <br /> " 2. Cnl ttthe znstallaff ont oP pae P1amDxaI2ht f wy <br /> 11I 3. Council reopens the thirty-day protest period. f the city <br /> i receives written protests from property more <br /> whose property <br /> is, subject to 0 percent o P thecurrent cost <br /> dissolvedestimate, the LID is dissolved and the city absorbs the <br /> p expenditures to Cate, r <br /> Iua He said In calculating the number of protests under that option, the <br /> (6 <br /> $2,024,000 figure would be used and would be spread on the basis of <br /> aS fill area as the preliminary roll was spread. <br /> 1 He said at the workshop the council was told that the highest and <br /> best useof all the property withinthe boundaries Regional <br /> ( vi� Commercial Centex/Office Park. He said those that historically <br /> received the C2 rezone have in fact received,and will in the future <br /> receive,some advantages over those that did not receive the rezone. <br /> ICouncilmember Overstreet asked if the staff had a preference of <br /> three <br /> these three alternatives end Mr.Jones said it was difficult for the <br /> AI I I staff to say and that was the reason for the appeal to council, <br /> 1 I f f <br /> z II I <br /> II <br /> "w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.