1988/10/26 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

439 October 26,1988 council will decide lLhae to See the project the t the nalestimatep iso P high above,Mat the estimate o4 the project is now, the council might be wise to gwnerseas theynhevetthepgreatesk told to get input Pram the prgperty gain d CM1e greatest to lase. Councilmembex Gipson asked how much had been spent on this and Mx. Jones replied$165,000 on design,etc.and Councilnember Gipson then said the city would lose this money as it had already been spent. Councilmembex Morrow spoke in favor Alternative No.3 and asked the City At toxney his opinion. Mx. Iles, Assistant City Attorney, said it would seem that Alternative 3,to reopen the protest period, is the fairest de it, ato d if it is protested out the LID c n go forward andy the city would be where it should be. Rick Fletcher of 9300 27th Ave.S.E.,owner of piopeoty in the LID, said he had already developed his property,but he as interested in buying other property in the area and could not do this until so decision had been made on the LID. some Gladys Corbin of 12925 28th Ava. H.M., Narysvill, asketl to be eliminated Prom Lhe LID,as she had: is available to her property. Frank Stipek of 9905 19th Ave.S.E.objected to the LID as the cost of the LIO s approaching the special benefits. He said his preliminary estimate twas$50,000 and the final is$107,000 He said I, heoagreetl that this should be protested out and reconsider the whole 'I Ribbert Whitacre, representing Ethel Savltr, property owner in the �I asked that the project proceed based on the preliminary estimate '.I given to the property owners and the city should pick up the balance. JimAllemdorfer,representing the Williams,Hansen and Ng ack Profit Sharv ing Plan properties said because of the increase in costs, the Mole process has changed and for this reasontias client is supporting Alternative 3. Give the property owners the new Pacts and see if they can live with them and the right to protest. His client would vote to protest. If it were protested out they would l me beck antl start 0 r again and perhaps exclude some property a requested tonight. Also to insist that all property ownersate right-of-way instead of Just a select few. iC Moved by Councilmembex Overstreet, seconded by Councilmembex Morrow q to reopen the thirty-day protest rpeiiee. f the city calves written protests ffrom oproperty owns whose property is subject to 60 percent r P the current t timate, the LID is dissolved antlrthe city bsoxbs uthe expenditures t0 date a u then I Lteed to negotiate with the property owners about forming another ID as soon as possible. Roll was Cauncilmembexalled$taphansanh Molxes excused.embers vOtSngMo[SonseEt carle COUNCIL BILL NC.889-107 I FINAL READING: AN ORDINANCE amending Sections 2m d 7 of Ordinance N 1121-83, the appeals procedures forthe Land Use He., Examiner.