Laserfiche WebLink
104 March 15,1989 <br /> Moved by Councilmeaber Gipson,seconded by Councilmembcr Langus that <br /> this is declared to be the Tinel reading of Council Bill No. 893-17 <br /> and the City Clerk is directed to call the roll for the final <br /> disposition of the ordinance. <br /> NAYS: Nanus,Niv6,Diamond,Gipson,Morrow <br /> ne <br /> EXCUSED: Pope,Overstreet <br /> Ordinance No.1569-89 adopted. <br /> COUNCIL BILL N0.893-18 <br /> SECOND READING: <br /> Ii <br /> AN ORDINANCE regulating vessels and their operation on the <br /> '2%12ble waterways deer the CSty on' Everett nd amending <br /> ex dt Municio. 46 12.02.170 containetl within Section <br /> DP Ordinance H 1206-86. <br /> COUNCIL BILL No.893-19 <br /> FIRST HEADING: <br /> AN ORDINAaO�CE eat L1ahing probationary pantos Pox <br /> employees d emending Section 9 of ordinance N0.1069-8A,new <br /> COUNCIL BILL No.893-20 <br /> FIRST READING: <br /> AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No 1388-87 which Created a <br /> special fund entitled Hewitt, Oakes, and Lombard Railroad <br /> Bridge Replacement" Fund 391 t0 accumulate <br /> umulate all the design,right-of-way end construction costsfor the Mewitt, Oakes, <br /> and Lombard bridge Replacement project, including bridge <br /> approach work and utility replacement ork. <br /> lif HEARING LID 726 FINAL ASSESSMENT <br /> L Caidenmt Nova reconoe ed Ntots final ease neat roll hearing for <br /> a 1 established <br /> District . 726. President 010w tated ts LID <br /> was srdisonhed to Install street p0Oveeints for 20th Street N.W. <br /> Ij and Hardison Road. This hearing wasoriginally Orated on February <br /> 8, 1989. At that time, the Everett City Council received the <br /> objections and protests toss s from several property owners, <br /> together with hely urrortingt lnformatlon, idence, and <br /> and testimony The city Council flea received Consultants in response to <br /> those protests. Following taese assessments <br /> presentations, the Everett City <br /> Council determined that the a nding Poe Parcels and had <br /> been erroneously calculated. ceccoxtlingly, the b Council determined e <br /> that the assessment Pox Parcel 0 should be reduced and the <br /> assessment for Parcel AA increased. <br /> I . <br />